Le 05/05/2015 00:10, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 08:00:14PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 21:01 +0200, christophe leroy wrote:
The generated code is most likely different on ppc64. I have no ppc64
compiler
For reference: yes you do. Just add -m64.
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 08:00:14PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 21:01 +0200, christophe leroy wrote:
The generated code is most likely different on ppc64. I have no ppc64
compiler
For reference: yes you do. Just add -m64.
Ideal (short of a 64-bit __wsum) would probably
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 21:01 +0200, christophe leroy wrote:
Le 25/03/2015 02:30, Scott Wood a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:39:27PM +0100, LEROY Christophe wrote:
The C version of csum_add() as defined in include/net/checksum.h gives the
following assembly:
0: 7c
Le 25/03/2015 02:30, Scott Wood a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:39:27PM +0100, LEROY Christophe wrote:
The C version of csum_add() as defined in include/net/checksum.h gives the
following assembly:
0: 7c 04 1a 14 add r0,r4,r3
4: 7c 64 00 10 subfc
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:39:27PM +0100, LEROY Christophe wrote:
The C version of csum_add() as defined in include/net/checksum.h gives the
following assembly:
0: 7c 04 1a 14 add r0,r4,r3
4: 7c 64 00 10 subfc r3,r4,r0
8: 7c 63 19 10
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:39:27PM +0100, LEROY Christophe wrote:
The C version of csum_add() as defined in include/net/checksum.h gives the
following assembly:
0: 7c 04 1a 14 add r0,r4,r3
4: 7c 64 00 10 subfc r3,r4,r0
8: 7c 63 19 10
