On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:23:19PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Sure. I'll try and get something working, though this merge window is not
> starting well so I may not get time for a few weeks :)
Do you already have something in mind?
Can you give us a hint?
Torsten
On 17/03/16 01:58, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:23:19PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Sure. I'll try and get something working, though this merge window is not
>> starting well so I may not get time for a few weeks :)
> Do you already have something in mind?
> Can you
On 15/03/16 12:27, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
>>> Move the logic to work out the kernel toc pointer into a header. This is
>>> a good cleanup, and also means we can use it elsewhere in future.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:58:42AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
> To be honest I think my v6 works well, but I don't have complete confidence
> due to the lack of proper testing. livepatch samples plus some others I wrote
> and I one Petr wrote all work (calling patched from within patched),
I
On Thu 2016-03-17 16:59:28, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:58:42AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> >
> > To be honest I think my v6 works well, but I don't have complete confidence
> > due to the lack of proper testing. livepatch samples plus some others I
> > wrote
> > and I one
On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 02:27 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > > Move the logic to work out the kernel toc pointer into a header. This is
> > > a good cleanup, and also means we can use it elsewhere in future.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Move the logic to work out the kernel toc pointer into a header. This is
> > a good cleanup, and also means we can use it elsewhere in future.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal
> > Reviewed-by: Torsten Duwe