On 07/10/2019 11:35 PM, wen.yan...@zte.com.cn wrote:
>>> we developed a coccinelle script to detect such problems.
>>
>> Would you find the implementation of the function “dt_init_idle_driver”
>> suspicious according to discussed source code search patterns?
>>
> In my experience, when you start looking at these of_node_put things,
> all sorts of strange things appear...
How much will this situation influence the achievement of further improvements
also for your software?
Regards,
Markus
> 180 break; ---> Jump out of
> the loop without releasing it
The device node reference is released behind this for loop.
> 183 if (!of_device_is_available(state_node)) {
> 184 of_node_put(state_node);
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, wen.yan...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> > > we developed a coccinelle script to detect such problems.
> >
> > Would you find the implementation of the function “dt_init_idle_driver”
> > suspicious according to discussed source code search patterns?
> >
> > we developed a coccinelle script to detect such problems.
>
> Would you find the implementation of the function “dt_init_idle_driver”
> suspicious according to discussed source code search patterns?
>
> we developed a coccinelle script to detect such problems.
Would you find the implementation of the function “dt_init_idle_driver”
suspicious according to discussed source code search patterns?
