Hi,
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:14:57PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 13:06 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:39:40AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 20:55 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
I'm running with HZ=100 so
On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 13:06 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:39:40AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 20:55 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
I'm running with HZ=100 so the values are still probably within
jiffy resolution, so perhaps the
Hi,
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:39:40AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 20:55 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
I'm running with HZ=100 so the values are still probably within
jiffy resolution, so perhaps the calculation should first do
idle = min(idle, total)?
Does
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:13:35AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 21:32 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
With 4.1-rc2 the rackmeter driver for G5 Xserve is giving bogus
led patterns. So far I have seen at least the following:
a) With static load the
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 20:55 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
I'm running with HZ=100 so the values are still probably within
jiffy resolution, so perhaps the calculation should first do
idle = min(idle, total)?
Does it gives you a reasonable output if you do that ?
Cheers,
Ben.
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 21:32 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
With 4.1-rc2 the rackmeter driver for G5 Xserve is giving bogus
led patterns. So far I have seen at least the following:
a) With static load the leds seems to be sane and report CPU
usage properly, but after few minutes they go
Hi,
With 4.1-rc2 the rackmeter driver for G5 Xserve is giving bogus
led patterns. So far I have seen at least the following:
a) With static load the leds seems to be sane and report CPU
usage properly, but after few minutes they go completely OFF,
even if the CPU load remains high.
b) On a
