Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: Linker segfault on powerpc when CONFIG_LKDTM=y (was Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 3/5] lkdtm: add function for testing .rodata section)

Kees Cook writes: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Kees Cook writes: >>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Michael Ellerman >>> wrote: scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: line

Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: Linker segfault on powerpc when CONFIG_LKDTM=y (was Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 3/5] lkdtm: add function for testing .rodata section)

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Kees Cook writes: > >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> Kees Cook writes: >>> This adds a function that lives in the

Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: Linker segfault on powerpc when CONFIG_LKDTM=y (was Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 3/5] lkdtm: add function for testing .rodata section)

Kees Cook writes: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Kees Cook writes: >> >>> This adds a function that lives in the .rodata section. The section >>> flags are corrected using objcopy since there is no

Re: Linker segfault on powerpc when CONFIG_LKDTM=y (was Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 3/5] lkdtm: add function for testing .rodata section)

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Kees Cook writes: > >> This adds a function that lives in the .rodata section. The section >> flags are corrected using objcopy since there is no way with gcc to >> declare section flags in an

Linker segfault on powerpc when CONFIG_LKDTM=y (was Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 3/5] lkdtm: add function for testing .rodata section)

Kees Cook writes: > This adds a function that lives in the .rodata section. The section > flags are corrected using objcopy since there is no way with gcc to > declare section flags in an architecture-agnostic way. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > ---