Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 17/10/2009 21:34:54:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OFEC00B9FB.B03AA854-ONC1257652.00644350-C1257652.
00651...@transmode.se you wrote:
Recompile and relink it with soft-fp as well. Or ask the provider to
do that.
That is what I am trying
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
ofefbde7c9.da9d5b8b-onc1257653.003e3dc6-c1257653.003f0...@transmode.se you
wrote:
If the application is really using FP instructions a lot, then there
is a huge difference between using soft-float and MATH_EMU; I
remember test cases where soft-float was
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 21:34 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
OK, but then you don't mix some libs/apps with soft and other
apps/libs with hard FP?
No, we never tried that. Sounds scary to me.
And dangerous. Hard-float and soft-float are ABI incompatible, so you
cannot
Anyone tried mixing hard and soft FP in on soft float CPU such as 83xx?
Been trying to figure out if this is a good idea or not.
Any combinations that will or won't work?
Generally I got soft FP in all system libs but there might be
an binary application which will use hard FP.
Is the MATH_EMU
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
ofc920e57f.dfabc29f-onc1257652.00421e11-c1257652.00434...@transmode.se you
wrote:
Anyone tried mixing hard and soft FP in on soft float CPU such as 83xx?
Hm... most 83xx have a FPU.
Been trying to figure out if this is a good idea or not.
Any
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 17/10/2009 20:12:24:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OFC920E57F.DFABC29F-ONC1257652.00421E11-C1257652.
00434...@transmode.se you wrote:
Anyone tried mixing hard and soft FP in on soft float CPU such as 83xx?
Hm... most 83xx have a FPU.
Yeah, I
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
ofec00b9fb.b03aa854-onc1257652.00644350-c1257652.00651...@transmode.se you
wrote:
Recompile and relink it with soft-fp as well. Or ask the provider to
do that.
That is what I am trying do/find out. The supplier claims that
it should not be a problem
