On 07/15/2014 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
I've got another question about powerpc reconfiguration. I was looking
at the dlpar_configure_connector() function in dlpar.c. I see that the
function has the ability to process multiple nodes with additional
sibling and child nodes. It appears to
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Tyrel Datwyler
turtle.in.the.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/15/2014 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
I've got another question about powerpc reconfiguration. I was looking
at the dlpar_configure_connector() function in dlpar.c. I see that the
function has the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Tyrel Datwyler
turtle.in.the.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/15/2014 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
I've got another question about powerpc reconfiguration. I was looking
at the
On 07/16/2014 05:26 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Tyrel Datwyler
turtle.in.the.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/15/2014 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
I've got another question about powerpc
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com wrote:
On 07/16/2014 05:26 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Tyrel Datwyler
turtle.in.the.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
On
I've got another question about powerpc reconfiguration. I was looking
at the dlpar_configure_connector() function in dlpar.c. I see that the
function has the ability to process multiple nodes with additional
sibling and child nodes. It appears to link them into a detached tree
structure, and the
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:59:31 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/25/2014 03:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:07:05 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/23/2014 09:58 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300,
Hi Grant,
On Jun 27, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:59:31 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/25/2014 03:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:07:05 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/23/2014 09:58 AM,
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:01:49 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/25/2014 03:24 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:10:55 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
heh! I have often thought about adding reference counting to device tree
On 06/27/2014 07:40 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Jun 27, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:59:31 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/25/2014 03:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:07:05 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
On 06/27/2014 07:41 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:01:49 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/25/2014 03:24 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:10:55 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
heh! I have often thought about adding
On 06/25/2014 03:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:07:05 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/23/2014 09:58 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
CCing Thomas
On 06/25/2014 03:24 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:10:55 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/23/2014 09:48 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:26:15 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/18/2014 03:07 PM, Grant Likely
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:07:05 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/23/2014 09:58 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
CCing Thomas Gleixner Steven Rostedt, since they might
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:10:55 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/23/2014 09:48 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:26:15 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/18/2014 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
I'm looking
On 06/23/2014 09:58 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
CCing Thomas Gleixner Steven Rostedt, since they might have a few
ideas...
On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Nathan and
On 06/23/2014 09:48 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:26:15 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/18/2014 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
I'm hoping you can help me.
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:26:15 -0500, Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
wrote:
On 06/18/2014 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
I'm hoping you can help me. Right now, pseries seems to be the only
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
CCing Thomas Gleixner Steven Rostedt, since they might have a few
ideas...
On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
I'm looking into lifecycle
Hi Grant,
On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:58 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
CCing Thomas Gleixner Steven Rostedt, since they might have a few
ideas...
On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Grant Likely
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:26:04 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:58 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
We'll also need a transition plan to move to RCU. I think the existing
iterators can be modified to do the rcu locking in-line, but still require
the
Hi Grant,
CCing Thomas Gleixner Steven Rostedt, since they might have a few
ideas...
On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
I'm hoping you can help me. Right now, pseries seems to be the
On 06/18/2014 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
I'm hoping you can help me. Right now, pseries seems to be the only
user of OF_DYNAMIC, but making OF_DYNAMIC work has a huge impact on
the entire kernel
Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
I'm hoping you can help me. Right now, pseries seems to be the only
user of OF_DYNAMIC, but making OF_DYNAMIC work has a huge impact on
the entire kernel because it requires all DT code to manage reference
24 matches
Mail list logo
