On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 09:58 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > The alternative bisection was as unsatisfactory as the first:
> > again it fingered an irrelevant merge (rather than any commit
> > pulled in by that merge) as the bad commit.
> >
> > It
On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 09:58 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> The alternative bisection was as unsatisfactory as the first:
> again it fingered an irrelevant merge (rather than any commit
> pulled in by that merge) as the bad commit.
>
> It seems this issue is too intermittent for bisection to be
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 12:49 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 12:49 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you test the impact of the
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Can you test the impact of the merge listed below ?(ie, revert the
> > > > merge and see if
> > > >
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > >
> > > Can you test the impact of the merge listed below ?(ie, revert the merge
> > > and see if
> > > we can reproduce and also verify with merge applied).
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >
> > Can you test the impact of the merge listed below ?(ie, revert the merge
> > and see if
> > we can reproduce and also verify with merge applied). This will give us a
> > set of commits to look closer.
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
> Can you test the impact of the merge listed below ?(ie, revert the merge and
> see if
> we can reproduce and also verify with merge applied). This will give us a
> set of commits to look closer. We had quiet a lot of page table
> related changes
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> I do run tests on G5, but obviously not rigorously enough. I kicked off a few
> kernel builds on mine and it survived, though once it hits swap it's almost
> unusably slow. I'll leave it running overnight and see if I hit anything.
Oh yes, I'd
Hugh Dickins writes:
> I've plagiarized the subject from Paulus's "Problems with THP" mail
> last weekend; but my similar problems are on PowerMac G5 baremetal,
> with 4kB pages, not capable of THP and no THP configured in.
>
> Under heavily swapping load, running kernel builds
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 18:10 -0800, Hugh Dickins via Linuxppc-dev wrote:
> I've plagiarized the subject from Paulus's "Problems with THP" mail
> last weekend; but my similar problems are on PowerMac G5 baremetal,
> with 4kB pages, not capable of THP and no THP configured in.
>
> Under heavily
I've plagiarized the subject from Paulus's "Problems with THP" mail
last weekend; but my similar problems are on PowerMac G5 baremetal,
with 4kB pages, not capable of THP and no THP configured in.
Under heavily swapping load, running kernel builds on tmpfs in limited
memory, I've been seeing
12 matches
Mail list logo