On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:35:56PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:30:35 -0600 John Linn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll try to better understand if we can detect the compressed device
tree and if we really have to disable the APU.
What's the reasoning for being independent
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 03:07:48PM -0600, John Linn wrote:
Hi Grant,
It appears that you designed the simpleImage around Xilinx FPGAs.
Yes.
Since we have to initialize the 16550 UART in the bootstrap and there's
no boot loader, were you thinking we would add the 16550 initialization
to
John == John Linn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi John,
+config PPC_FPU
+ depends on XILINX_VIRTEX_5_FXT
+ bool Enable Xilinx Soft FPU
+ help
+This option enables the Xilinx Soft FPU attached to the APU
+interface of the PPC440 (requires DP_FULL FPU pcore).
There is
: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440
support
John == John Linn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi John,
+config PPC_FPU
+ depends on XILINX_VIRTEX_5_FXT
+ bool Enable Xilinx Soft FPU
+ help
+This option enables the Xilinx Soft FPU attached to the APU
+interface of the PPC440
John == John Linn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Yes it is compatible with the normal powerpc FPU.
Ahh, great - That didn't used to be the case with the earlier fpu
stuff afaik.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
8:02 AM
To: John Linn
Cc: Josh Boyer; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440
support
John == John Linn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Yes it is compatible with the normal powerpc FPU.
Ahh, great - That didn't used to be the case
: Monday, June 23, 2008 7:36 PM
To: John Linn
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] powerpc: Xilinx: adding virtex5 powerpc 440
support
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:30:35 -0600
John Linn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ *
+ * Copyright 2007 IBM Corporation
+ * Based on cuboot-83xx.c, which
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:28:53 -0600
John Linn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an early patch against the mainline that I wanted to start
getting comments on.
I would appreciate any feedback.
I already see a few things that I need to look into myself.
1.I'm not sure why we need to
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index 3934e26..94adfe1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -483,6 +483,81 @@ config SECCOMP
If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here.
+config WANT_DEVICE_TREE
+ bool
+
Thanks for the comments Josh.
I commented on the others that Stephen didn't comment on.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/io.h b/arch/powerpc/boot/io.h
index ccaedae..ec57ec9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/io.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/io.h
@@ -99,4 +99,11 @@ static inline void barrier(void)
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:30:35 -0600
John Linn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ *
+ * Copyright 2007 IBM Corporation
+ * Based on cuboot-83xx.c, which is:
+ * Copyright (c) 2007 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify
it
11 matches
Mail list logo