Cc: jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; linux-fbdev-de...@lists.sourceforge.net;
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org;
akonova...@ru.mvista.com; adap...@gmail.com; Suneel Garapati
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [V2] Xilinx : Framebuffer Driver: Add PLB support
(non-DCR)
What tree is this patch prepared against
, April 12, 2009 12:15 AM
To: John Linn
Cc: jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; linux-fbdev-de...@lists.sourceforge.net;
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org;
akonova...@ru.mvista.com; adap...@gmail.com; Suneel Garapati
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [V2] Xilinx : Framebuffer Driver: Add PLB support
(non-DCR)
What
...@lists.sourceforge.net; adap...@gmail.com; Suneel
Garapati; linuxppc-
d...@ozlabs.org; akonova...@ru.mvista.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [V2] Xilinx : Framebuffer Driver: Add PLB
support(non-DCR)
I thought it was based on mainline, but I now see the weirdness you're
talking about. I'll dig
What tree is this patch prepared against? The version in mainline
already does PLB access, and doesn't support DCR at all. It appears
that this driver is based on something that does the opposite.
g.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:17 PM, John Linn john.l...@xilinx.com wrote:
From: Suneel
