On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer
wrote:
> It seems to me like what's confused in the defconfigs is two concepts:
> 1) The requirements of a platform (what options must be set and must not
> be set)
> 2) The guarantee that a particular config was known to work at some
> point in
-
> bounces+stephen=neuendorffer.n...@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Grant
Likely
> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 4:13 PM
> To: grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/5200: Update defconfigs
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:17 PM,
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
> CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> ---
... and my timing is fantastic in light of the defconfig discussion
going on on the LKML. :-)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/2/472
g.
___
