description: The dcr-access-method attribute
is on the dcr-controller, not the dcr slave.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 3:03 PM
> To: Stephen Neuendorffer
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
>
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 15:02 -0700, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Any thoughts about device tree bindings for indirect DCR?
No, not really. For 44x PCI-E, I've just used something like an
"sdr-base" property to provide the base SDR for the port, simple but not
necessarily the nicest way t
Ben,
Any thoughts about device tree bindings for indirect DCR?
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 3:03 PM
> To: Stephen Neuendorffer
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH
bs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] [v2][POWERPC] refactor dcr code
>
>
> On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 09:23 -0700, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> > Previously, dcr support was configured at compile time to either
using
> > MMIO or native dcr instructions. Although this works for mo
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 09:23 -0700, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> Previously, dcr support was configured at compile time to either using
> MMIO or native dcr instructions. Although this works for most
> platforms, it fails on FPGA platforms:
>
> 1) Systems may include more than one dcr bus.
> 2)
