Christoph Hellwig writes:
> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> index 06e07278b456fa..b34c1eb9e7ad8e 100644
> --- a/fs/exec.c
> +++ b/fs/exec.c
> @@ -391,47 +391,34 @@ static int bprm_mm_init(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> return err;
> }
>
> -struct user_arg_ptr {
> -#ifdef
From: Al Viro
> Sent: 26 March 2021 16:12
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 03:38:30PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > +static const char __user *
> > +get_user_arg_ptr(const char __user *const __user *argv, int nr)
> > {
> > + if (in_compat_syscall()) {
> > + const compat_uptr_t
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 03:38:30PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> -static const char __user *get_user_arg_ptr(struct user_arg_ptr argv, int nr)
> +static const char __user *
> +get_user_arg_ptr(const char __user *const __user *argv, int nr)
> {
> - const char __user *native;
> -
> -#ifdef
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 3:38 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> The only differenence betweeen the compat exec* syscalls and their
> native versions is the compat_ptr sign extension, and the fact that
> the pointer arithmetics for the two dimensional arrays needs to use
> the compat pointer size.
