On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 12:56:54PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:08:50PM +0800, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
> >
> > > Some discussion with the the freescale rep. lead to the CSB frequency
> > > of the 8313 (166MHz) being significantly lower than that of the 8343.
> > > Is the
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:08:50PM +0800, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
>
> > Some discussion with the the freescale rep. lead to the CSB frequency
> > of the 8313 (166MHz) being significantly lower than that of the 8343.
> > Is the CSB the critical point here?
>
> I believe the CSB is critical point he
> Some discussion with the the freescale rep. lead to the CSB frequency
> of the 8313 (166MHz) being significantly lower than that of the 8343.
> Is the CSB the critical point here?
I believe the CSB is critical point here. They are right.
> Note: the IXP42x uses an internal bus speed of 133MHz
> > On Aug 6, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> >> With the mpc8...@400mhz I get a throughput of approx.
> 24500 frames/s
> >> using the predefined firewall rules.
>
> >> With the MPC8313 I get a significantly lower value:
> >> mpc8...@250mhz 12500fps
> >> mpc8...@333mhz
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:16:55PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 6, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>> With the mpc8...@400mhz I get a throughput of approx. 24500 frames/s
>> using the predefined firewall rules.
>> With the MPC8313 I get a significantly lower value:
>> mpc8...@250mhz
On Aug 6, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
Hi!
I am currently evaluating the performance of the MPC8313E for firewall
(and VPN) purposes.
The results obtained do not match my expectations so I would be
interested
in some discussion.
Test setup:
---
A linux 2.6.27 based firewa
