Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fpr save/restore function cleanups

2016-11-14 Thread Michael Ellerman
Nicholas Piggin writes: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:41:12 +1100 > Nicholas Piggin wrote: > >> On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:22:19 +1100 >> Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> >> > The powerpc64 linker generates fpr save/restore functions on-demand, >> > placing them in the .sfpr section. So remove the explicitly c

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fpr save/restore function cleanups

2016-10-31 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Nicholas, [auto build test ERROR on v4.9-rc3] [also build test ERROR on next-20161028] [cannot apply to powerpc/next] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for conven

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fpr save/restore function cleanups

2016-10-31 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Nicholas, [auto build test ERROR on v4.9-rc3] [also build test ERROR on next-20161028] [cannot apply to powerpc/next] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for conven

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fpr save/restore function cleanups

2016-10-31 Thread Nicholas Piggin
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:41:12 +1100 Nicholas Piggin wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:22:19 +1100 > Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > > The powerpc64 linker generates fpr save/restore functions on-demand, > > placing them in the .sfpr section. So remove the explicitly coded ones > > from the 64 build. > >

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fpr save/restore function cleanups

2016-10-31 Thread Nicholas Piggin
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:22:19 +1100 Nicholas Piggin wrote: > The powerpc64 linker generates fpr save/restore functions on-demand, > placing them in the .sfpr section. So remove the explicitly coded ones > from the 64 build. > > Have 32-bit put save/restore functions into .sfpr section rather than