On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 07:19:57AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 27/03/2019 à 19:21, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >Yeah, okay, we should have some PHDRS statement here still. You can drop
> >the dummy segment, and the notes segment as well, or you can keep the notes
> >section in both the
Le 27/03/2019 à 19:21, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:47:55AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:40:32AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 26/03/2019 à 23:29, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
I tried to reproduce this. It does not fail with a
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:47:55AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:40:32AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > Le 26/03/2019 à 23:29, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> > >I tried to reproduce this. It does not fail with a ppc6xx_defconfig
> > >build, and
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:40:32AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 26/03/2019 à 23:29, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >I tried to reproduce this. It does not fail with a ppc6xx_defconfig
> >build, and mpc885_ads_defconfig fails with
>
> So far, the only defconfig which fails for me is
Le 27/03/2019 à 09:56, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 26/03/2019 à 21:12, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:28:58PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 26/03/2019 à 21:12, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:28:58PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
STACK off0x vaddr 0x paddr
Le 26/03/2019 à 23:29, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:12:31PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:28:58PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:29:43PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:12:31PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:28:58PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> > > >On Tue, Mar
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:12:31PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:28:58PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> > >On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > >>STACK off
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:28:58PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>STACK off0x vaddr 0x paddr 0x align 2**4
> >> filesz
Le 26/03/2019 à 19:19, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
STACK off0x vaddr 0x paddr 0x align 2**4
filesz 0x memsz 0x flags rwx
You need to prevent this one somehow. What
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:55:33AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>STACK off0x vaddr 0x paddr 0x align 2**4
> filesz 0x memsz 0x flags rwx
You need to prevent this one somehow. What object file forces this?
Setting the program headers
Le 26/03/2019 à 01:55, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
Joel Stanley writes:
Segher added some workarounds for GCC 4.2 and bintuils 2.18. We now set
4.6 and 2.20 as the minimum, so they can be dropped.
This is mostly a revert of c6995fe4 ("powerpc: Fix build bug with
binutils < 2.18 and GCC
On 03/26/2019 12:55 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Joel Stanley writes:
Segher added some workarounds for GCC 4.2 and bintuils 2.18. We now set
4.6 and 2.20 as the minimum, so they can be dropped.
This is mostly a revert of c6995fe4 ("powerpc: Fix build bug with
binutils < 2.18 and GCC <
Joel Stanley writes:
> Segher added some workarounds for GCC 4.2 and bintuils 2.18. We now set
> 4.6 and 2.20 as the minimum, so they can be dropped.
>
> This is mostly a revert of c6995fe4 ("powerpc: Fix build bug with
> binutils < 2.18 and GCC < 4.2").
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley
> ---
Segher Boessenkool writes:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:02:53AM +1030, Joel Stanley wrote:
>> Segher added some workarounds for GCC 4.2 and bintuils 2.18. We now set
>> 4.6 and 2.20 as the minimum, so they can be dropped.
>
> It was a bug in binutils _before_ 2.18, only seen by people using GCC
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:02:53AM +1030, Joel Stanley wrote:
> Segher added some workarounds for GCC 4.2 and bintuils 2.18. We now set
> 4.6 and 2.20 as the minimum, so they can be dropped.
It was a bug in binutils _before_ 2.18, only seen by people using GCC
_before_ 4.2.
It's all ancient
17 matches
Mail list logo
