On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:59:52AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Ram Pai linux...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:14:51AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Tue,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Ram Pai linux...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:14:51AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:03 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
Lets say we
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 13:57 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
Hmm.. this code is not about determining what kind of segment the
platform is returning. This code is about using the right alignment
constraints for the type of segment from which resource will be
allocated. right?
b_res is the resource
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:16:59PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 13:57 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
Hmm.. this code is not about determining what kind of segment the
platform is returning. This code is about using the right alignment
constraints for the type of segment
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:03 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
Lets say we passed that 'type' flag to size the minimum
alignment constraints for that b_res. And window_alignment(bus,
type) of your platform used that 'type' information to
determine whether to use the
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:03 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
Lets say we passed that 'type' flag to size the minimum
alignment constraints for that b_res. And window_alignment(bus,
type) of
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:14:51AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:03 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
Lets say we passed that 'type' flag to size the minimum
alignment
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:38:18PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:03 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
Lets say we passed that 'type' flag to size the minimum
alignment constraints for that b_res. And window_alignment(bus,
type) of your platform
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:07:46AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
4. Either b_res-flags mask or type to be used for window_alignment(),
I don't think it's big deal because b_res-flags mask == type for
current implementation. However, I'm not sure I still need change it
to type?
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:30:28PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
The patch changes function pbus_size_io() and pbus_size_mem() to
do resource (I/O, memory and prefetchable memory) reassignment
based on the minimal alignments for the p2p bridge, which was
retrieved by function
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:23:17AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
The patch changes function pbus_size_io() and pbus_size_mem() to
do resource (I/O, memory and prefetchable memory) reassignment
based on the minimal alignments for the p2p bridge, which was
retrieved by function window_alignment().
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:05:47PM +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:23:17AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
The patch changes function pbus_size_io() and pbus_size_mem() to
do resource (I/O, memory and prefetchable memory) reassignment
based on the minimal alignments for the p2p
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:36:49PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:23:33PM +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:05:47PM +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:23:17AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
The patch changes function pbus_size_io() and
13 matches
Mail list logo
