On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 05:18:24AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:35:11PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> > index ccc0c1f93daa..a9a5285bdb39 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> > +++ b/
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:35:11PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> index ccc0c1f93daa..a9a5285bdb39 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> @@ -1717,7 +1717,12 @@ static int nvme_configure_
On 30.10.2015 [21:48:48 +], Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:35:11PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > Given that it's 4K just about everywhere by default (and sort of
> > implicitly expected to be, I guess), I think I'd prefer we default to
> > 4K. That should mitigate the p
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:35:11PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Given that it's 4K just about everywhere by default (and sort of
> implicitly expected to be, I guess), I think I'd prefer we default to
> 4K. That should mitigate the performance impact (I'll ask our IO team to
> do some runs,
