Excerpts from Andy Lutomirski's message of June 20, 2021 1:50 am:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, at 11:02 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Excerpts from Mathieu Desnoyers's message of June 19, 2021 6:09 am:
>> > - On Jun 18, 2021, at 3:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org wrote:
>> >
>> >> On
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, at 11:02 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Mathieu Desnoyers's message of June 19, 2021 6:09 am:
> > - On Jun 18, 2021, at 3:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >>> - On Jun
Excerpts from Mathieu Desnoyers's message of June 19, 2021 6:09 am:
> - On Jun 18, 2021, at 3:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> - On Jun 17, 2021, at 8:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org wrote:
>>>
>>> >
- On Jun 18, 2021, at 3:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Jun 17, 2021, at 8:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org wrote:
>>
>> > On 6/17/21 7:47 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> >
>> >> Please change back
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Jun 17, 2021, at 8:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org wrote:
>
> > On 6/17/21 7:47 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >
> >> Please change back this #ifndef / #else / #endif within function for
> >>
> >> if
- On Jun 17, 2021, at 8:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org wrote:
> On 6/17/21 7:47 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
>> Please change back this #ifndef / #else / #endif within function for
>>
>> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE)) {
>> ...
>> } else {
>> ...
>> }
>>
Le 16/06/2021 à 20:52, Andy Lutomirski a écrit :
On 6/15/21 9:45 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
Excerpts from Andy Lutomirski's message of June 16, 2021 1:21 pm:
The old sync_core_before_usermode() comments suggested that a non-icache-syncing
return-to-usermode instruction is x86-specific and
On 6/17/21 8:16 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Jun 15, 2021, at 11:21 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> +# An architecture that wants to support
>> +# MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE needs to define precisely what
>> it
>> +# is supposed to do and
On 6/17/21 7:47 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Please change back this #ifndef / #else / #endif within function for
>
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE)) {
> ...
> } else {
> ...
> }
>
> I don't think mixing up preprocessor and code logic makes it more readable.
I
- On Jun 15, 2021, at 11:21 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org wrote:
[...]
> +# An architecture that wants to support
> +# MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE needs to define precisely what
> it
> +# is supposed to do and implement membarrier_sync_core_before_usermode() to
> +#
- On Jun 15, 2021, at 11:21 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org wrote:
> The old sync_core_before_usermode() comments suggested that a
> non-icache-syncing
> return-to-usermode instruction is x86-specific and that all other
> architectures automatically notice cross-modified code on return
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, at 3:20 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>
> For the arm64 bits (docs and asm/sync_core.h):
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon
>
Thanks.
Per Nick's suggestion, I renamed the header to membarrier.h. Unless I hear
otherwise, I'll keep the ack.
> Will
>
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, at 11:52 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On 6/15/21 9:45 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Excerpts from Andy Lutomirski's message of June 16, 2021 1:21 pm:
> >> The old sync_core_before_usermode() comments suggested that a
> >> non-icache-syncing
> >> return-to-usermode
On 6/15/21 9:45 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Andy Lutomirski's message of June 16, 2021 1:21 pm:
>> The old sync_core_before_usermode() comments suggested that a
>> non-icache-syncing
>> return-to-usermode instruction is x86-specific and that all other
>> architectures automatically
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 08:21:13PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The old sync_core_before_usermode() comments suggested that a
> non-icache-syncing
> return-to-usermode instruction is x86-specific and that all other
> architectures automatically notice cross-modified code on return to
>
Excerpts from Andy Lutomirski's message of June 16, 2021 1:21 pm:
> The old sync_core_before_usermode() comments suggested that a
> non-icache-syncing
> return-to-usermode instruction is x86-specific and that all other
> architectures automatically notice cross-modified code on return to
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
