+/ {
+ model = Analogue Micro Adder MPC875;
This should probably be just MPC875.
Segher
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:08:43PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
+/ {
+model = Analogue Micro Adder MPC875;
This should probably be just MPC875.
There's more than one board with an MPC875 on it.
-Scott
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
+ model = Analogue Micro Adder MPC875;
This should probably be just MPC875.
There's more than one board with an MPC875 on it.
model is the model name the vendor uses. It isn't supposed to
be unique globally, nor does
+ model = Analogue Micro Adder MPC875;
This should probably be just MPC875.
There's more than one board with an MPC875 on it.
model is the model name the vendor uses. It isn't supposed to
be unique globally, nor does it say what CPU is on the board.
The name the vendor uses is Adder
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:48:12PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
+model = Analogue Micro Adder MPC875;
This should probably be just MPC875.
There's more than one board with an MPC875 on it.
model is the model name the vendor uses. It isn't supposed to
be unique globally,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 02:12:55PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:48:12PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
So it should be Adder MPC875, then :-)
Any particular reason to leave out potentially useful information in a
field that is for human consumption?
Other than
+ model = Analogue Micro Adder MPC875;
This should probably be just MPC875.
There's more than one board with an MPC875 on it.
model is the model name the vendor uses. It isn't supposed to
be unique globally, nor does it say what CPU is on the board.
The name the vendor uses is
BTW, IEEE1275 seems to disagree:
No it doesn't.
A manufacturer-dependent string that generally specifies the model
name
and number (including revision level) for this device. The format of
the text string is arbitrary, although in conventional usage the
string
begins with the
BTW, IEEE1275 seems to disagree:
No it doesn't.
...in conventional usage the string begins with the name of the
device's
manufacturer.
You cut that sentence short here, it continues: as with the name
property.
Even if you want to quibble about the manner in which the
manufacturer is
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:57:28PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
BTW, IEEE1275 seems to disagree:
No it doesn't.
...in conventional usage the string begins with the name of the
device's
manufacturer.
You cut that sentence short here, it continues: as with the name
property.
You
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:30:23PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:57:28PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
BTW, IEEE1275 seems to disagree:
No it doesn't.
...in conventional usage the string begins with the name of the
device's
manufacturer.
You cut that
11 matches
Mail list logo
