I was pointed by Glauber to the slab common code patches. I need some
more time to read the patches. Now I think the slab/slot changes in this
v3 are not needed, and can be ignored.
That may take some kernel cycles. You have a current issue here that needs
to be fixed.
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 09:01 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
I was pointed by Glauber to the slab common code patches. I need some
more time to read the patches. Now I think the slab/slot changes in this
v3 are not needed, and can be ignored.
That may take some kernel cycles. You have a
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 08:56 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
I thought I posted this a couple of days ago. Would this not fix things
without having to change all the allocators?
I was pointed by Glauber to the slab common code patches. I need some
more time to read the patches. Now I think the
On 07/06/2012 11:54 AM, Li Zhong wrote:
+ if (!c lname)
+ kfree(lname);
+
kfree can still be validly called with a NULL argument. No need for the
lname in the conditional.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
I thought I posted this a couple of days ago. Would this not fix things
without having to change all the allocators?
Subject: slub: Dup name earlier in kmem_cache_create
Dup the name earlier in kmem_cache_create so that alias
processing is done using the copy of the string and not
the string
