On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
Hi,
Below is a patch to fix a couple of issues with fake numa node creation
on ppc:
1) Presently, fake nodes could be created such that real numa node
boundaries are not respected. So a node could have lmbs that belong to
different real nodes.
Hi David,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:37:05PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
Hi,
Below is a patch to fix a couple of issues with fake numa node creation
on ppc:
1) Presently, fake nodes could be created such that real numa node
boundaries are
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
Currently, the behavior of fake numa is not so on x86 as well? Below is
a sample output from a single node x86 system booted with numa=fake=8:
# cat node0/cpulist
# cat node1/cpulist
...
# cat node6/cpulist
# cat node7/cpulist
0-7
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:06 AM, David Rientjesrient...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
Currently, the behavior of fake numa is not so on x86 as well? Below is
a sample output from a single node x86 system booted with numa=fake=8:
# cat node0/cpulist
# cat
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Balbir Singh wrote:
Right, I'm proposing an alternate mapping scheme (which we've used for
years) for both platforms such that a cpu is bound (and is set in
cpumask_of_node()) to each fake node with which it has physical affinity.
That is the only way for zonelist
