On Mon 15-07-19 12:54:20, David Hildenbrand wrote:
[...]
> So I'm leaving it like it is. arch_remove_memory() will be mandatory for
> architectures implementing arch_add_memory().
I do agree that removing CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE makes some sense. But
this patch being a mid step should be simpler
On 01.07.19 14:51, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 01-07-19 10:01:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Mon 27-05-19 13:11:47, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> We want to improve error handling while adding memory by allowing
>>> to use arch_remove_memory() and __remove_pages() even if
>>>
On Mon 01-07-19 10:01:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 27-05-19 13:11:47, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > We want to improve error handling while adding memory by allowing
> > to use arch_remove_memory() and __remove_pages() even if
> > CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE is not set to e.g., implement something
On Mon 27-05-19 13:11:47, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> We want to improve error handling while adding memory by allowing
> to use arch_remove_memory() and __remove_pages() even if
> CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE is not set to e.g., implement something like:
>
> arch_add_memory()
> rc =
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 08:59:43AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>On 04.06.19 00:15, Wei Yang wrote:
>> Allow arch_remove_pages() or arch_remove_memory()?
>
>Looks like I merged __remove_pages() and arch_remove_memory().
>
>@Andrew, can you fix this up to
>
>"mm/memory_hotplug: Allow
On 04.06.19 10:31, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 08:59:43AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 04.06.19 00:15, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> Allow arch_remove_pages() or arch_remove_memory()?
>>
>> Looks like I merged __remove_pages() and arch_remove_memory().
>>
>> @Andrew, can you fix this
On 04.06.19 00:15, Wei Yang wrote:
> Allow arch_remove_pages() or arch_remove_memory()?
Looks like I merged __remove_pages() and arch_remove_memory().
@Andrew, can you fix this up to
"mm/memory_hotplug: Allow arch_remove_memory() without
CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE"
? Thanks!
>
> And want to
Allow arch_remove_pages() or arch_remove_memory()?
And want to confirm the kernel build on affected arch succeed?
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:11:47PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>We want to improve error handling while adding memory by allowing
>to use arch_remove_memory() and
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 7:12 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> We want to improve error handling while adding memory by allowing
> to use arch_remove_memory() and __remove_pages() even if
> CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE is not set to e.g., implement something like:
>
> arch_add_memory()
>
