On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:29:57 -0600 Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
Well, I've got to start somewhere...
So here goes. I've begun the work to merge and clean up the OF device
tree
Hi Grant,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:06:15 -0600 Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
In the mean time, I've pushed out the current series with acked-bys
added to my git server. I think I'm ready for things to start going
into linux-next. Since this is the first time I've asked for a
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:06:15 -0600 Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
In the mean time, I've pushed out the current series with acked-bys
added to my git server. I think I'm ready for
Hi Grant,
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:29:57 -0600 Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
Well, I've got to start somewhere...
So here goes. I've begun the work to merge and clean up the OF device
tree handling code and this is my first set of patches. Not fully
tested yet, but I'm
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, David Miller wrote:
From: Chris Newport c...@netunix.com
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:29:25 +0100 (BST)
Sun4d has never had SMP support and
Wrong.
this is apparantly problematic due to Cray interlectual property
causing a lack of bus documentation.
XBUS documentation is
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 23:49:04 Grant Likely wrote:
However, I've completely devoted to this work for at least the next
two months, so there are plenty more patches to follow. Once I've
got all the common code merged between Microblaze, PowerPC and Sparc
I'll be fix the endian problems
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 22:49:04 -0600
Also, I'd like to take on responsibility for maintaining the cross-
architecture device tree code. If there are no objections, I'll
write a patch to add a device tree section to MAINTAINERS.
Feel free. And
However, I've completely devoted to this work for at least the next
two months, so there are plenty more patches to follow. Once I've
\o/ Thanks, Grant! A seperate tree would be great. Patches look good to me:
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
--
Pengutronix e.K.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 23:49:04 Grant Likely wrote:
However, I've completely devoted to this work for at least the next
two months, so there are plenty more patches to follow. Once I've
got all the common code merged
Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 23:49:04 Grant Likely wrote:
However, I've completely devoted to this work for at least the next
two months, so there are plenty more patches to follow. Once I've
got all the
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:18:04PM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 14:49, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
So here goes. I've begun the work to merge and clean up the OF device
...@secretlab.ca
Cc: s...@canb.auug.org.au; devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org;
microblaze-ucli...@itee.uq.edu.au;
sparcli...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] Merge common OpenFirmware device tree
code
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Date: Tue, 6
Sun3 doesn't have OF
When I was first developing Open Boot for the SPARCstation-1, I was also
simultaneously trying to do it for a Sun-3 system that was being built
at the same time.
It proved to be too much to do both jobs at the same time, especially in
light of all the hardware
From: Chris Newport c...@netunix.com
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:54:34 +0100 (BST)
Sun4c has also been broken for a long time and sun4d has never worked
properly. Is it time to also prune these ?.
That would leave only Sun4m in the 32bit kernel, which still works and
has plenty of ongoing user
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Mitch Bradley wrote:
Taking this one step further, I don't see any real good reason to continue
supporting Sun4 going forward. I got rid of my Sun4 systems long ago because
it was just too hard to keep them working - after having used them long after
most people had moved
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 09:52:43AM -0400, Sam Creasey wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:18:04PM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
On the subject of merging code, I know that the SUN3 code in m68k uses
a similar prom interface to the sparc32 code. (and I've also
considered unifying that and ...
From: Chris Newport c...@netunix.com
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:29:25 +0100 (BST)
Sun4d has never had SMP support and
Wrong.
this is apparantly problematic due to Cray interlectual property
causing a lack of bus documentation.
XBUS documentation is not available, but we fully know how to
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
Well, I've got to start somewhere...
So here goes. I've begun the work to merge and clean up the OF device
tree handling code and this is my first set of patches. Not fully
tested yet, but I'm getting them out to
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 14:49, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
So here goes. I've begun the work to merge and clean up the OF device
tree handling code and this is my first set of patches. Not fully
19 matches
Mail list logo
