On Nov 10, 2011, at 08:37, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_FSL_E500MC) || defined(CONFIG_FSL_E5500)
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_E500_V1_V2
>
> doesn't exist yet, so patch is wrong sequence order.
Oops, d'oh.
You are completely correct, tha
On Nov 9, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> Certain processor types are co-supportable, and their machine-check
> handlers will be referenced if the entries in cputable.c are actually
> generated, so allow more than one machine-check handler to be built in.
>
> This fixes a bug where confi
