Re: [RFC PATCH next-20200930] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")

2020-10-05 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 00:34 +, Joel Stanley wrote: > arch/powerpc/boot is the powerpc wrapper, and it's not built with the > same includes or flags as the rest of the kernel. It doesn't include > any of the headers in the top level include/ directory for hysterical > raisins. > > The

Re: [RFC PATCH next-20200930] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")

2020-10-05 Thread Nick Desaulniers
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 1:19 PM Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 14:39 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrch/ote: > > Hi! > > > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > > > So it looks like the best option is to exclude these > > > > 2 files from conversion. > > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH next-20200930] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")

2020-10-05 Thread Joel Stanley
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 20:19, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 14:39 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrch/ote: > > Hi! > > > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > > > So it looks like the best option is to exclude these > > > > 2 files from conversion. > > > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH next-20200930] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")

2020-10-05 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 11:36 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > I don't think there's anything wrong with manually including it and adding `-I > ` (capital i) if needed. All of this is secondary to the actual change to use quoted __section("foo") rather than __section(foo) I'd rather get that done

Re: [RFC PATCH next-20200930] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")

2020-10-01 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 14:39 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrch/ote: > Hi! > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > > So it looks like the best option is to exclude these > > > 2 files from conversion. > > > > Agreed. Nevertheless, is there any reason arch/powerpc/*

Re: [RFC PATCH next-20200930] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")

2020-10-01 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > So it looks like the best option is to exclude these > > 2 files from conversion. > > Agreed. Nevertheless, is there any reason arch/powerpc/* should not be > compiling cleanly with compiler.h? (CC'ing the rest of the PowerPC

Re: [RFC PATCH next-20200930] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")

2020-10-01 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 12:15 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > Hi Joe, Buenas Miguel. > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 12:56 AM Joe Perches wrote: > > So I installed the powerpc cross compiler, and > > nope, that doesn't work, it makes a mess. > > Thanks a lot for reviving the script and sending the

Re: [RFC PATCH next-20200930] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")

2020-10-01 Thread Miguel Ojeda
Hi Joe, On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 12:56 AM Joe Perches wrote: > > So I installed the powerpc cross compiler, and > nope, that doesn't work, it makes a mess. Thanks a lot for reviving the script and sending the treewide cleanup! > So it looks like the best option is to exclude these > 2 files from