On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:00:01AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:24:55 -0500,
Timur Tabi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Nicolin Chen
guangyu.c...@freescale.com wrote:
+static int fsl_ssi_set_dai_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai,
+
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Nicolin Chen
guangyu.c...@freescale.com wrote:
+static int fsl_ssi_set_dai_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai,
+ int clk_id, unsigned int freq, int dir)
+{
+ struct fsl_ssi_private *ssi_private =
Sir,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:24:55PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Nicolin Chen
guangyu.c...@freescale.com wrote:
+static int fsl_ssi_set_dai_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai,
+ int clk_id, unsigned int freq, int dir)
+{
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Nicolin Chen
guangyu.c...@freescale.com wrote:
It compiles well with my ARM cross compiler. I guess it might be related
to the compiler's version? But we should fix it anyway. Would you mind if
I submit a patch? Or you do it directly?
I just submitted a
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:44:48PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Nicolin Chen
guangyu.c...@freescale.com wrote:
It compiles well with my ARM cross compiler. I guess it might be related
to the compiler's version? But we should fix it anyway. Would you mind if
