On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:26 PM, David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
spi-controller {
#address-cells = 2;
#size-cells = 0;
[EMAIL PROTECTED],f000 { reg = 0 f000 ; } // CS 0, SPI address
f000
[EMAIL
On Friday 23 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
Very good point. Okay, so we cannot assume any correlation between
the number of CS lines and the number of child nodes to the SPI bus.
That wasn't what I was implying ... all the devices hooked
up to a given chipselect should be viewed as a single
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
spi-controller {
#address-cells = 2;
#size-cells = 0;
[EMAIL PROTECTED],f000 { reg = 0 f000 ; } // CS 0, SPI address f000
[EMAIL PROTECTED],f000 { reg = 1 f000 ; } // CS 1, SPI address f000
[EMAIL