On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 13:42 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
+ arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc512x_shared.c: error: 'enum
fsl_diu_monitor_port' declared inside parameter list [-Werror]: =
70:9, 84:9, 88:36
+ arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc512x_shared.c: error:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Thanks. These are all freescale platforms, the relevant people should be
already but I've added Scott and Kumar to the CC list just in case.
Seeing how this is my code, I'd say the relevant people were not CC'd. :-)
Anyway, I think I see what the problem is, but
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com wrote:
Anyway, I think I see what the problem is, but it does appear when I use
the normal defconfigs. What .config was being used?
I meant to say that it does NOT appear.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 b04...@freescale.com wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com wrote:
Anyway, I think I see what the problem is, but it does appear when I use
the normal defconfigs. What .config was being used?
I meant to say
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
+ arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc512x_shared.c: error: 'enum
fsl_diu_monitor_port' declared inside parameter list [-Werror]: =
70:9, 84:9, 88:36
+ arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc512x_shared.c: error: 'return' with
a value, in function returning void
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
powerpc randconfig
Doesn't this generate a different .config every time it's run? Do I keep
generating random .config files until the problem shows up?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
Linuxppc-dev
On 05/17/2012 01:44 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
powerpc randconfig
Doesn't this generate a different .config every time it's run? Do I keep
generating random .config files until the problem shows up?
Regardless of the config that shows this, the MSR[GS] check should
Scott Wood wrote:
Regardless of the config that shows this, the MSR[GS] check should go
away. If you have a /hypervisor node, you already know you're a guest.
Fair enough.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
JFYI, when comparing v3.4-rc7 to v3.4-rc6[3], the summaries are:
- build errors: +15/-14
15 regressions:
+ arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc512x_shared.c: error: 'enum
fsl_diu_monitor_port' declared inside
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 10:47 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
+ lib/mpi/generic_mpih-mul1.c: error: inconsistent operand
constraints in an 'asm': = 50:70
+ lib/mpi/generic_mpih-mul2.c: error: inconsistent
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:46 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 10:47 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
+ lib/mpi/generic_mpih-mul1.c: error: inconsistent
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:46 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 10:47 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
+ lib/mpi/generic_mpih-mul1.c: error: inconsistent
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 10:47 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
JFYI, when comparing v3.4-rc7 to v3.4-rc6[3], the summaries are:
- build errors: +15/-14
15 regressions:
+
On 16-May-12, at 10:46 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
Wow, lib/mpi/ is a complete horror: it's full of hand crafted asm
code.
The error in this case appears to be that umul_ppm() is implemented as
an xmpyu instruction. That's a floating point instruction. We
deliberately compile the kernel with
14 matches
Mail list logo
