Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with Linus' tree

2016-09-13 Thread Nicholas Piggin
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:48:03 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 2:02:57 PM CEST Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > [For the new cc's, we are discussing the "thin archives" and "link dead > > code/data elimination" patches in the kbuild tree.] > > > > On Tue, 13

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with Linus' tree

2016-09-13 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 2:02:57 PM CEST Stephen Rothwell wrote: > [For the new cc's, we are discussing the "thin archives" and "link dead > code/data elimination" patches in the kbuild tree.] > > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:39:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with Linus' tree

2016-09-12 Thread Nicholas Piggin
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:02:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Michal, > > [For the new cc's, we are discussing the "thin archives" and "link dead > code/data elimination" patches in the kbuild tree.] > > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:39:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with Linus' tree

2016-09-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Michal, [For the new cc's, we are discussing the "thin archives" and "link dead code/data elimination" patches in the kbuild tree.] On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:39:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:03:08 +0200 Michal Marek wrote: >