Hi Kumar,
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 1, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger
w...@grandegger.com wrote:
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:05:28AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
+
On Apr 2, 2009, at 1:38 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Socrates is a new board and it has no problem using an up-to-date
version of U-Boot. The socrates.dts file in your next tree already
has
the device_type = soc removed. We need to add fsl,soc to the
compatible property and update
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 2, 2009, at 1:38 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Socrates is a new board and it has no problem using an up-to-date
version of U-Boot. The socrates.dts file in your next tree already has
the device_type = soc removed. We need to add fsl,soc to the
compatible
On Apr 2, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Re-add the device_type soc to socrates.dts
The device_type soc is still required for MPC85xx boards.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/socrates.dts |1 +
1 file
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:05:28AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
+ soc8...@e000 {
+ #address-cells = 1;
+ #size-cells = 1;
+ device_type = soc;
Drop device_type here too.
Grrr, I just realized that removing the
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com wrote:
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:05:28AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
+ soc8...@e000 {
+ #address-cells = 1;
+ #size-cells = 1;
+
Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
wrote:
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:05:28AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
+ soc8...@e000 {
+ #address-cells = 1;
+ #size-cells = 1;
+
On Apr 1, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
wrote:
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:05:28AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
+ soc8...@e000 {
+
Grant Likely wrote:
I agree 100% with David's comments, and I have some additional ones below.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
wrote:
+ soc8...@e000 {
+ #address-cells = 1;
+ #size-cells = 1;
+
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
wrote:
Grant Likely wrote:
I agree 100% with David's comments, and I have some additional ones below.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
wrote:
+ soc8...@e000 {
+
Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
wrote:
Grant Likely wrote:
I agree 100% with David's comments, and I have some additional ones below.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
wrote:
+
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
wrote:
Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
wrote:
Grant Likely wrote:
I agree 100% with David's comments, and I have some additional ones below.
On Thu, Mar
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:05:28AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
+ soc8...@e000 {
+ #address-cells = 1;
+ #size-cells = 1;
+ device_type = soc;
Drop device_type here too.
Grrr, I just realized that removing the devices type soc has
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Anton Vorontsov
avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:05:28AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
+ soc8...@e000 {
+ #address-cells = 1;
+ #size-cells = 1;
+ device_type = soc;
Drop
Grant Likely wrote:
I agree 100% with David's comments, and I have some additional ones below.
OK.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
wrote:
+ soc8...@e000 {
+ #address-cells = 1;
+ #size-cells = 1;
+
David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 04:26:44PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
[snip]
[snip[
+disp...@2,0 {
+compatible = fujitsu,lime;
This compat string looks slightly worryingly non-specific.
The node is for the Lime graphic controller from
Hi Kumar,
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Mar 19, 2009, at 10:26 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
+m...@24520 {
+#address-cells = 1;
+#size-cells = 0;
+compatible = fsl,gianfar-mdio;
+reg = 0x24520 0x20;
+
+phy0: ethernet-...@0 {
David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 04:26:44PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
This patch adds support for the socrates board based on the MPC8544.
Supported are Ethernet, serial console, I2C, I2C-based RTC and
temperature sensors, NOR and NAND flash, PCI, USB, CAN and Lime
display
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 04:26:44PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
This patch adds support for the socrates board based on the MPC8544.
Supported are Ethernet, serial console, I2C, I2C-based RTC and
temperature sensors, NOR and NAND flash, PCI, USB, CAN and Lime
display controller.
The
On Mar 19, 2009, at 10:26 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
+ m...@24520 {
+ #address-cells = 1;
+ #size-cells = 0;
+ compatible = fsl,gianfar-mdio;
+ reg = 0x24520 0x20;
+
+
I agree 100% with David's comments, and I have some additional ones below.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
wrote:
+ soc8...@e000 {
+ #address-cells = 1;
+ #size-cells = 1;
+ device_type = soc;
Drop
21 matches
Mail list logo
