Scott Wood wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
I was looking at the arch/powerpc/boot/.gitignore file.
Why are all of those non-local-directory files listed there?
E.g., empty.c, inf*.c, inf*.h, zconf.h, zlib.h, zutil.h, etc.
>>
>> Why would these files be listed in arch/powerpc/boot/.gitig
Randy Dunlap wrote:
I was looking at the arch/powerpc/boot/.gitignore file.
Why are all of those non-local-directory files listed there?
E.g., empty.c, inf*.c, inf*.h, zconf.h, zlib.h, zutil.h, etc.
Why would these files be listed in arch/powerpc/boot/.gitignore ??
Because they're created whe
Sean MacLennan wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:24:05 -0700
> "Randy Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was looking at the arch/powerpc/boot/.gitignore file.
>> Why are all of those non-local-directory files listed there?
>> E.g., empty.c, inf*.c, inf*.h, zconf.h, zlib.h, zutil.h,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Sean MacLennan,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
I believe if the dts is built into u-boot, the dtc is not built.
This is never the case. The device tree is considered to be part of
and provided to the boot loader by the kernel.
No, it's provided to the
Dear Sean MacLennan,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I believe if the dts is built into u-boot, the dtc is not built.
This is never the case. The device tree is considered to be part of
and provided to the boot loader by the kernel.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Softwa
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:24:05 -0700
"Randy Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at the arch/powerpc/boot/.gitignore file.
> Why are all of those non-local-directory files listed there?
> E.g., empty.c, inf*.c, inf*.h, zconf.h, zlib.h, zutil.h, etc.
>
> And what is "dtc"? I
Hi,
I was looking at the arch/powerpc/boot/.gitignore file.
Why are all of those non-local-directory files listed there?
E.g., empty.c, inf*.c, inf*.h, zconf.h, zlib.h, zutil.h, etc.
And what is "dtc"? I see a dtc-src directory, but "dtc" is MIA.
Same for kernel-vmlinux.strip.*
Thanks,
~Randy
_
