Re: bpf, powerpc: fix jit for seccomp_data access

On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:49:20 UTC, Mark Lord wrote: > I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform, > and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF > even though the interpreter was working fine. > > The issue was that the compiler was missing one of the instructions >

Re: [PATCH] bpf, powerpc: fix jit for seccomp_data access

"Naveen N. Rao" writes: > Mark Lord wrote: >> On 18-02-21 07:52 AM, Mark Lord wrote: >>> On 18-02-21 03:35 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: >> .. Looks good to me, but I am not able to apply this patch. There seems to be whitespace damage. >>> >>> Here

Re: [PATCH] bpf, powerpc: fix jit for seccomp_data access

Daniel Borkmann writes: > On 02/21/2018 01:33 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Mark Lord writes: >> >>> I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform, >>> and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF >>> even though the interpreter

Re: [PATCH] bpf, powerpc: fix jit for seccomp_data access

Mark Lord wrote: On 18-02-21 07:52 AM, Mark Lord wrote: On 18-02-21 03:35 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: .. Looks good to me, but I am not able to apply this patch. There seems to be whitespace damage. Here (attached) is a clean copy. Again, this time with the commit message included!

Re: [PATCH] bpf, powerpc: fix jit for seccomp_data access

On 18-02-21 07:52 AM, Mark Lord wrote: > On 18-02-21 03:35 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: .. >> Looks good to me, but I am not able to apply this patch. There seems to be >> whitespace damage. > > Here (attached) is a clean copy. Again, this time with the commit message included! I am using SECCOMP

Re: [PATCH] bpf, powerpc: fix jit for seccomp_data access

On 18-02-21 03:35 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > Mark Lord wrote: >> I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform, >> and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF >> even though the interpreter was working fine. >> >> The issue was that the compiler was missing one of the

Re: [PATCH] bpf, powerpc: fix jit for seccomp_data access

Mark Lord wrote: I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform, and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF even though the interpreter was working fine. The issue was that the compiler was missing one of the instructions used by SECCOMP, so here is a patch to enable

Re: [PATCH] bpf, powerpc: fix jit for seccomp_data access

On 02/21/2018 01:33 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Mark Lord writes: > >> I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform, >> and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF >> even though the interpreter was working fine. >> >> The issue was that the compiler

Re: [PATCH] bpf, powerpc: fix jit for seccomp_data access

Mark Lord writes: > I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform, > and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF > even though the interpreter was working fine. > > The issue was that the compiler was missing one of the instructions > used by SECCOMP, so

[PATCH] bpf, powerpc: fix jit for seccomp_data access

I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform, and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF even though the interpreter was working fine. The issue was that the compiler was missing one of the instructions used by SECCOMP, so here is a patch to enable JIT for that