David Miller wrote:
> From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:39:05 -0500
>
>> As for making it ARCH specific, that doesn't really help since not
>> all PPC hw has the limitation I spoke of. Not even all MPIC (in our
>> cases) have the limitation.
>
> Since the PPC cod
From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:39:05 -0500
> As for making it ARCH specific, that doesn't really help since not
> all PPC hw has the limitation I spoke of. Not even all MPIC (in our
> cases) have the limitation.
Since the PPC code knows exactly which MPICs have th
Chris Snook wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
So why not just have x86 startup code set irq_default_affinity =
CPU_MASK_ALL than?
That doesn't really solve the problem, as a user could still manually
set an invalid affinity. The MPIC driver should reduce the affinity
itself to wha
Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
So why not just have x86 startup code set irq_default_affinity =
CPU_MASK_ALL than?
That doesn't really solve the problem, as a user could still manually
set an invalid affinity. The MPIC driver should reduce the affinity
itself to what the hardware can h
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 24, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Chris Snook wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 24, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Chris Snook wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
It appears the default IRQ affinity changes from being just cpu 0
to all cpu's. This breaks several PPC SMP systems in which only a
singl
Kumar Gala wrote:
So why not just have x86 startup code set irq_default_affinity =
CPU_MASK_ALL than?
That doesn't really solve the problem, as a user could still manually
set an invalid affinity. The MPIC driver should reduce the affinity
itself to what the hardware can handle.
-Scott
___
On Oct 24, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Chris Snook wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 24, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Chris Snook wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
It appears the default IRQ affinity changes from being just cpu 0
to all cpu's. This breaks several PPC SMP systems in which only
a single processor is al
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 24, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Chris Snook wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
It appears the default IRQ affinity changes from being just cpu 0 to
all cpu's. This breaks several PPC SMP systems in which only a
single processor is allowed to be selected as the destination of the
IRQ.
On Oct 24, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Chris Snook wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
It appears the default IRQ affinity changes from being just cpu 0
to all cpu's. This breaks several PPC SMP systems in which only a
single processor is allowed to be selected as the destination of
the IRQ.
What is the ri
Kumar Gala wrote:
It appears the default IRQ affinity changes from being just cpu 0 to all
cpu's. This breaks several PPC SMP systems in which only a single
processor is allowed to be selected as the destination of the IRQ.
What is the right answer in fixing this? Should we:
cpumask_t i
It appears the default IRQ affinity changes from being just cpu 0 to
all cpu's. This breaks several PPC SMP systems in which only a single
processor is allowed to be selected as the destination of the IRQ.
What is the right answer in fixing this? Should we:
cpumask_t irq_default_af
11 matches
Mail list logo
