On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 14:26 +0400, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
On 6/13/14, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:12:08AM +0100, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
On 6/12/14, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:00:57PM +0100, Denis
On 13 Jun 2014, at 22:44, Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 09:56 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
OK, so that's the DART table allocated via alloc_dart_table(). Is
dart_tablebase removed from the kernel linear mapping after allocation?
Yes.
If
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:12:08AM +0100, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
On 6/12/14, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:00:57PM +0100, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
On 6/12/14, Denis Kirjanov k...@linux-powerpc.org wrote:
On 6/12/14, Catalin Marinas
On 6/13/14, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:12:08AM +0100, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
On 6/12/14, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:00:57PM +0100, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
On 6/12/14, Denis Kirjanov
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 09:56 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
OK, so that's the DART table allocated via alloc_dart_table(). Is
dart_tablebase removed from the kernel linear mapping after allocation?
Yes.
If that's the case, we need to tell kmemleak to ignore this block (see
patch below,
