Hi Greg,
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:57:19 -0700 Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:39:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
driver-core/driver-core-remove-no-longer-used-struct-class_device.patch
should be merged late
I still need to revert this so that the scsi
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:57:19 -0700 Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:39:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
I have started this tree by reverting the following:
driver-core/driver-core-remove-no-longer-used-struct-class_device.patch
should be merged late
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:21:21 -0700
Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:39:53 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git
(tar balls at
Hi all,
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git
(tar balls at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/).
You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
file in the source. There are
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:39:53 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git
(tar balls at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/).
gcc doesn't like nested /* comments:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:39:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git
(tar balls at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/).
You can see which trees have
