On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 15:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
powerpc64-linux-ld:
/src/next/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c:189:(.text+0x89b990):
sibling call optimization to `_restgpr0_28' does not allow automatic
multiple TOCs;
recompile with -mminimal-toc or
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 16:24 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 15:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
powerpc64-linux-ld:
/src/next/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c:189:(.text+0x89b990):
sibling call optimization to `_restgpr0_28' does not allow
automatic
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 03:36:01PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 17:50 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
powerpc64-linux-ld: arch/powerpc/net/built-in.o: In
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 17:07 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 16:24 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 15:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
powerpc64-linux-ld:
/src/next/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c:189:(.text+0x89b990):
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:38:27PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 17:07 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 16:24 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 15:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
powerpc64-linux-ld:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 08:18:39PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
Linker bug. That's not a sibling call, but a normal function return
via an out-of-line register restore function.
I couldn't see how this might be occurring, then I remembered the
kernel has this horrible practise of using ld -r to
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 21:13 +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 08:18:39PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
Linker bug. That's not a sibling call, but a normal function return
via an out-of-line register restore function.
I couldn't see how this might be occurring, then I remembered
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
powerpc64-linux-ld: arch/powerpc/net/built-in.o: In function
`bpf_slow_path_word':
(.text+0x90): sibling call optimization to `skb_copy_bits' does not allow
automatic multiple TOCs;
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 17:50 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
I hate our ABI is a good answer ? :-)
I'll see what I can do tomorrow. Poke me when I'm in the office.
Cheers,
Ben.
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 17:50 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
powerpc64-linux-ld: arch/powerpc/net/built-in.o: In function
`bpf_slow_path_word':
(.text+0x90): sibling call optimization
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 09:32:14PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 19:49 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi ,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
kernel/built-in.o: In function
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 09:32:14PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 19:49 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi ,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
Hi ,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `irq_dispose_mapping':
(.opd+0x159f0): multiple definition of `irq_dispose_mapping'
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.opd+0x960): first defined here
On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 19:49 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi ,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `irq_dispose_mapping':
(.opd+0x159f0): multiple definition of `irq_dispose_mapping'
Hi Ben,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:24:10 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc64 allnoconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `.sys_call_table':
(.text+0x8d48): undefined reference to
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc64 allnoconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `.sys_call_table':
(.text+0x8d48): undefined reference to `.compat_sys_recv'
Caused by commit 86250b9d12caa1a3dee12a7cf638b7dd70eaadb6 (powerpc:
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:19 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: of_i8042_kbd_irq [drivers/input/serio/i8042.ko] undefined!
ERROR: of_i8042_aux_irq [drivers/input/serio/i8042.ko]
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: of_i8042_kbd_irq [drivers/input/serio/i8042.ko] undefined!
ERROR: of_i8042_aux_irq [drivers/input/serio/i8042.ko] undefined!
Presumably missing EXPORT_SYMBOLs ..
--
Cheers,
Stephen
18 matches
Mail list logo
