* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Yinghai,
>
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:06 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> > Also, we may need to remove all extern and __init and __initdata etc in .h
> > files.
> >
> > please check
> >
> > [PATCH -v3] memblock: Fix section mismatch warning
> >
> > Use __init_
Hi Yinghai,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:06 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> Also, we may need to remove all extern and __init and __initdata etc in .h
> files.
>
> please check
>
> [PATCH -v3] memblock: Fix section mismatch warning
>
> Use __init_memblock to replace __init, and remove __init in memb
Hi Yinghai,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:33:34 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> On 09/14/2010 05:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Do not remove the "extern" key word.
>
> why? you got another warning?
It is normal C coding practice to mark declarations in header files with
extern. It probably does
On 09/14/2010 05:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Yinghai,
>
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:06 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> Also, we may need to remove all extern and __init and __initdata etc in .h
>> files.
>
> Do not remove the "extern" key word.
>
why? you got another warning?
Yinghai
_
Hi Yinghai,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:06 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> Also, we may need to remove all extern and __init and __initdata etc in .h
> files.
Do not remove the "extern" key word.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
On 09/13/2010 09:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Yinghai,
>
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:24:20 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> On 09/12/2010 09:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Your patch fixes some of the warnings, but still leaves these for a
>>> powerpc allnoconfig build:
>>>
>>> WARNING:
Hi Yinghai,
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:24:20 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> On 09/12/2010 09:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Your patch fixes some of the warnings, but still leaves these for a
> > powerpc allnoconfig build:
> >
> > WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25d80): Section mismatch in refe
On 09/12/2010 09:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Your patch fixes some of the warnings, but still leaves these for a
> powerpc allnoconfig build:
>
> WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25d80): Section mismatch in reference from the
> function memblock_double_array() to the function .init.text:me
On 09/12/2010 08:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the scsi-post-merge tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allnoconfig, i386 defconfig and others) produced these warnings (I build
> with CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y):
>
> WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25910): Se
Hi Yinghai,
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:14:15 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> please check it, and it should get into core/memblock branch.
>
> Thanks
>
> Yinghai
>
> [PATCH] memblock: Fix section mismatch warning
>
> for arches that use memblock other than x86
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell
> Si
Hi all,
After merging the scsi-post-merge tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig, i386 defconfig and others) produced these warnings (I build
with CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y):
WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25910): Section mismatch in reference from the
function memblock_find_i
11 matches
Mail list logo
