wn broken under recent Linux kernels?
> >> I've
> >> never used them before...
>
> > Hrm, something is indeed wrong, hard to say what tho. My canyonlands
> > works fine (460EPx) and I can try a Taishan one of these days (440GX
> > iirc). What is in sequ
ts on the Sequoia known broken under recent Linux kernels?
> >> I've
> >> never used them before...
>
> > Hrm, something is indeed wrong, hard to say what tho. My canyonlands
> > works fine (460EPx) and I can try a Taish
lands
> works fine (460EPx) and I can try a Taishan one of these days (440GX
> iirc). What is in sequoia ? I think it's a GX no ?
Sequoia is equipped with 440EPx.
I observe the 'mal_probe' crash on the Katmai board too (based on
440SPe):
PPC 4xx OCP EMAC driver, version 3.5
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:36:32AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 14:37 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Roland Dreier wrote:
>> > > Can you double check that the e1000 isn't copying the PCI resources into
>> > > a unsigned long before ioremap'i
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 14:37 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > Can you double check that the e1000 isn't copying the PCI resources into
> > > a unsigned long before ioremap'ing the result, thus cropping the top
> > > bits ?
> >
> > as far as I can
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Can you double check that the e1000 isn't copying the PCI resources into
> > a unsigned long before ioremap'ing the result, thus cropping the top
> > bits ?
>
> as far as I can see, e1000 is using pci_ioremap_bar(), which should do
> the right thing
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 09:34 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 03:42:25PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > > There isn't that I know of. The EMAC code creates a single NAPI instance
> > > for all EMACs and I think used to
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 03:42:25PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > There isn't that I know of. The EMAC code creates a single NAPI instance
> > for all EMACs and I think used to completely disconnect things. The old
> > code created a fake
> Can you double check that the e1000 isn't copying the PCI resources into
> a unsigned long before ioremap'ing the result, thus cropping the top
> bits ?
as far as I can see, e1000 is using pci_ioremap_bar(), which should do
the right thing as long as resource_size_t is the right type (which i
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 16:24 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > Forget my last posting! It's just a dirty work around when having a single
> > EMAC.
> > It does not work with two EMACs like on sequoia.
>
> Indeed. It doesn't on my sequoia :-(
>
> I al
> Could it be that simple. Probably not. It works at a first glace on
> a 405EP ang GPr board. But it might cause problems when having more than
> one EMAC up at the same time.
I talked with the network folks and that should be ok.
We only need to be a bit careful in case for some reason the EM
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> Forget my last posting! It's just a dirty work around when having a single
> EMAC.
> It does not work with two EMACs like on sequoia.
Indeed. It doesn't on my sequoia :-(
I also tried reviving connectivity by adding an Intel PRO/1000 GT network card,
b
Forget my last posting! It's just a dirty work around when having a single EMAC.
It does not work with two EMACs like on sequoia.
Matthias
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 23:50, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 15:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:44:34PM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> > >With Linus' latest git, mal_probe crashes. It calls netif_napi_add with
> > >the first parameter NULL. Th
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 15:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:44:34PM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> > >With Linus' latest git, mal_probe crashes. It calls netif_napi_add with
> > >the first parameter NULL. This was ok since
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 15:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:44:34PM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> >With Linus' latest git, mal_probe crashes. It calls netif_napi_add with
> >the first parameter NULL. This was ok since the parameter, a net
> >device, was only used if CONFIG_NE
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:44:34PM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote:
>With Linus' latest git, mal_probe crashes. It calls netif_napi_add with
>the first parameter NULL. This was ok since the parameter, a net
>device, was only used if CONFIG_NETPOLL was set.
>
>Now it is always de-referenced. A quick che
With Linus' latest git, mal_probe crashes. It calls netif_napi_add with
the first parameter NULL. This was ok since the parameter, a net
device, was only used if CONFIG_NETPOLL was set.
Now it is always de-referenced. A quick check shows that ibm_newemac is
the only driver that passed NULL as the
18 matches
Mail list logo
