Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break

2009-02-12 Thread Sachin P. Sant
Nick Piggin wrote: Actually, that's not the root cause here. You seem to have CONFIG_SMP disabled but CONFIG_NUMA enabled. That's not possible on x86 which makes me think it's a ppc kconfig bug. Hmm? If it is really a valid config, then we should be able to make slqb build with it... I am

Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break

2009-02-11 Thread David Miller
From: Nick Piggin Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:45:03 +0100 > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:53:51PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Actually, that's not the root cause here. You seem to have CONFIG_SMP > > disabled but CONFIG_NUMA enabled. That's not possible on x86 which > > makes me think it's a ppc kc

Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break

2009-02-11 Thread Nick Piggin
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:53:51PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Sachin P. Sant wrote: > > Sachin P. Sant wrote: > >> > >> Hi Stephen, > >> > >> Todays next randconfig build on powerpc fails with > >> > >>  CC      mm/slqb.o > >> mm/slqb.c: In function __slab_free:

Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break

2009-02-10 Thread Pekka Enberg
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Sachin P. Sant wrote: > Sachin P. Sant wrote: >> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> Todays next randconfig build on powerpc fails with >> >>  CC      mm/slqb.o >> mm/slqb.c: In function __slab_free: >> mm/slqb.c:1648: error: implicit declaration of function >> slab_free_to_remo