Re: ppc4xx simple vs SoC's

2011-12-01 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote: Hi Josh ! I was helping Tony with some of the Currituck stuff when I noticed an oddity... So we have various SoC config symbols such as 440EP, 460SX, etc... that in turn select various bits pieces that

Re: ppc4xx simple vs SoC's

2011-12-01 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 06:44 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: However, the entry for ppc44x_simple doesn't select any of these, meaning for example, AFAIK, that you don't get EMAC4 etc... I'm surprised things work at all ! What am I missing ? CONFIG_PPC44x_SIMPLE is selected by the board

ppc4xx simple vs SoC's

2011-11-30 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Hi Josh ! I was helping Tony with some of the Currituck stuff when I noticed an oddity... So we have various SoC config symbols such as 440EP, 460SX, etc... that in turn select various bits pieces that enable support for that SoC (such as EMAC4 support or FPU support). Those only act as enables