On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 11:47 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Sounds good.
BTW. The patch relies on some perctr changes I don't have in my tree
(PERF_COUNT_SW_ALIGNMENT_FAULTS isn't defined for me)
Ingo, how do you want to handle that ? Should I wait til round 2 of the
merge window
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:26 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 11:47 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Sounds good.
BTW. The patch relies on some perctr changes I don't have in my tree
(PERF_COUNT_SW_ALIGNMENT_FAULTS isn't defined for me)
Ingo, how do you want
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 14:14 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Hi !
I've started collecting things for my -next branch. For now I put
everything in -test, I'll move it over to -next in the upcoming couple
of days if there's no major issue found.
I'm seeing this on Power 6 (Didgo3),
On Jul 26, 2009, at 10:34 AM, wilbur.chan wrote:
e500 , in head_fsl_booke.S
We know,the first two steps are:
1) invalidate all entries except the entry we are in
2) setup a temp mapping and jump to it respectively:
tlbwe
bl 1f
1: mflr r9
rlwimi
Linas Vepstas linasveps...@gmail.com wrote on 07/24/2009 05:30:09 PM:
2009/7/24 Richard Lary rl...@us.ibm.com:
Linas Vepstas linasveps...@gmail.com wrote on 07/23/2009 07:44:33 AM:
2009/7/15 Mike Mason mm...@us.ibm.com:
By default, EEH does what's known as a hot reset during error
I found a patch for kexec on Booke in the archives:
http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-November/064798.html
In this pacth , we use an entry to setup a 1:1 mapping , whose size
is 1GB. However, in e500, the max mapping size for
a single entry is 256M. So I have to setup 4
Hello,
I'm working on a custom board using an AMCC 440EP that is using a proprietary
bootloader(optimized for fast boot time). Currently our bootloader loads a
simpleImage.initrd into RAM and jumps into it. I originally chose to use a
simpleImage with an initial ramdisk embedded because it
Dear Eddie Dawydiuk,
In message 4a6ddf80@embeddedarm.com you wrote:
I'm working on a custom board using an AMCC 440EP that is using a proprietary
bootloader(optimized for fast boot time). Currently our bootloader loads a
simpleImage.initrd into RAM and jumps into it. I originally chose
We've got some people that are currently running an older linux kernel
(from before the ppc/ppc64 merge and the conversion to device tree) on
an Emerson/Motorola cpci6115 (also known as mcpn905) compactPCI board.
They're wondering if it's possible to upgrade to a more recent kernel.
I don't see
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Hrm... my powerpc-next branch will contain stuff that depend on it, so
I'll probably have to pull it in though, unless I tell all my
sub-maintainers to also pull from that other branch first :-)
Ok, I'll just apply the patch. It does look
Wolfgang,
In message 4a6ddf80@embeddedarm.com you wrote:
I'm working on a custom board using an AMCC 440EP that is using a proprietary
bootloader(optimized for fast boot time). Currently our bootloader loads a
simpleImage.initrd into RAM and jumps into it. I originally chose to use a
On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:24 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
This patch adds max_direct_dma_addr to struct dev_archdata to remove
addr_needs_map in struct dma_mapping_ops. It also converts
dma_capable() to use max_direct_dma_addr.
max_direct_dma_addr is initialized in pci_dma_dev_setup_swiotlb(),
On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:24 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
Now swiotlb_pci_dma_ops is identical to swiotlb_dma_ops; we can use
swiotlb_dma_ops with any devices. This removes swiotlb_pci_dma_ops.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Acked-by: Becky Bruce
On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:24 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
POWERPC needs this hook. SPARC could use it too.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Acked-by: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
---
include/linux/dma-mapping.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0
On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:24 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
This converts uses dma_map_ops struct (in include/linux/dma-mapping.h)
instead of POWERPC homegrown dma_mapping_ops.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Acked-by: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
---
On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:24 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Fujita,
Since you're removing all the uses of it, you should probably remove
PPC_NEED_DMA_SYNC_OPS from arch/powerpc/Kconfig:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:11 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Hrm... my powerpc-next branch will contain stuff that depend on it, so
I'll probably have to pull it in though, unless I tell all my
sub-maintainers to also pull from that other
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 07:40:41PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
zImage starting: loaded at 0x0190 (sp: 0x0fdc3a08)
Allocating 0x165ca04 bytes for kernel ...
gunzipping (0x - 0x0190c000:0x02f58efc)...done 0x1637b54 bytes
You loaded the image at 0190, but the uncompr4essed
(Adding cc:devicetree-discuss)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Eddie Dawydiuk ed...@embeddedarm.com wrote:
Thanks for the link. Although, I'm not looking for info on optimizing
boot time. Rather I'm looking for information on what the path of least
resistance is to boot a kernel with an
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:06:42AM +0530, vijay sharma wrote:
2)Built cuImage and loaded it into memory. I am not seeing any output once
control passes from wrapper to kernel. As you can see from logs mentioned
above.
Try enabling early udbg console output. Also, make sure that Linux is
using
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:51:03PM +1000, Mark Ware wrote:
This is another alloc_bootmem() - kzalloc() change, this time to
fix the non-fatal badness caused when booting with a cpm2_uart console.
Signed-Off-By: Mark Ware mw...@elphinstone.net
---
drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c |
vijay sharma wrote:
Linux/PowerPC load:
Finalizing device tree... flat tree at 0x2f65300 == Beyond this point no
output is available.
I have found that on my MPC8272 system running 2.6.28 cuImage, the
/chosen/linux,stdout-path node is respected by the boot wrapper, but the
main kernel always
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:11 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Hrm... my powerpc-next branch will contain stuff that depend on it, so
I'll probably have to pull it in though, unless I tell all my
sub-maintainers to also pull from that other
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
Yup, that seems to be what happened. I've never seen a warning about this
with any compiler version, otherwise we would have caught this much
earlier. As soon as the addr - a rename took place it blew up
immediately as a redefinition. Is there a
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:17:40AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:11 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Hrm... my powerpc-next branch will contain stuff that depend on it, so
I'll probably have to pull it in
So I opened powerpc-next, and pushed the pile that was in test (with
an additional bug fix to one of my patches that was causing the crash
at boot that mpe reported with hugetlbfs enabled).
The pre-req patch for adding an argument to __pte_free_tlb() has already
been merged upstream by Linus.
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:08:46 -0500
Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:24 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Fujita,
Since you're removing all the uses of it, you should probably remove
27 matches
Mail list logo
