Robert Richter robert.rich...@amd.com wrote on 2011/11/18 00:20:27:
On 17.11.11 22:27:46, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
For my e300c2 cpu both if's are false and I don't get support for
callgraph/backtrace
support. Moving the ops-backtrace = op_powerpc_backtrace; to the top
enables
Robert Richter robert.rich...@amd.com wrote on 2011/11/18 00:20:27:
On 17.11.11 22:27:46, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
For my e300c2 cpu both if's are false and I don't get support for
callgraph/backtrace
support. Moving the ops-backtrace = op_powerpc_backtrace; to the top
enables
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:42:14PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On 11/16/2011 03:55 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
From: Li Yang le...@freescale.com
The timebase sync is not only necessary when using KEXEC. It should also
be used by normal boot up and cpu hotplug. Remove the ifdef added by
the
On 16.11.2011, at 23:50, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This series of patches updates the Book3S-HV KVM code that manages the
guest hashed page table (HPT) to enable several things:
* MMIO emulation and MMIO pass-through
* Use of small pages (4kB or 64kB, depending on config) to back the
guest
The Freescale P1022 has a unique pin muxing feature where the DIU video
controller's video signals are muxed with 24 of the local bus address signals.
When the DIU is enabled, the bulk of the local bus is disabled, preventing
access to memory-mapped devices like NOR flash and the pixis FPGA.
In
When the P1022's DIU video controller is active, the pixis must be accessed
in indirect mode, which uses localbus chip select addresses.
Switching between the DVI and LVDS monitor ports is handled by the pixis,
so that switching needs to be done via indirect mode.
This has the side-effect of no
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:35:02AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Nov 16, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 11/16/2011 03:55 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
From: Li Yang le...@freescale.com
The timebase sync is not only necessary when using KEXEC. It should also
be used by normal boot
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:00:04AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
How do I update the device tree from platform code?
prom_update_property()
I assume this needs to be called after the DT has been unflattened,
since it takes a device_node* as a parameter. Is there any way I
Scott Wood wrote:
What's wrong with doing it in setup_arch()?
Well, I was hoping to encapsulate everything into one function -- the
early_param() callback function. But I guess that's not going to work.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 02:57:11PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
This touches areas that I'm sure non-PPC people would want to see as
well. Could you please CC kvm@vger too next time?
Avi, Marcelo, mind to review some of the bits in this patch set? :)
I did cc the last patch (the one that
Hi Timur,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:09:17 -0600 Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com wrote:
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
+ struct device_node *indirect_node = NULL;
+ struct ccsr_guts_85xx __iomem *guts = NULL;
+ u8 __iomem *lbc_lcs0_ba = NULL;
+ u8 __iomem *lbc_lcs1_ba = NULL;
And if you
11 matches
Mail list logo
