Allow the LPID bit width and partition table size to be set at runtime
from the device tree.
Move the PID bit width detection into the same place.
KVM does not support using different sizes yet, this is mainly required
to get the PTCR register values correct.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin
---
MAINTAINERS lacks of proper coverage for FSL headers. Fix it accordingly.
Fixes: 7aa1aa6ecec2 ("QE: Move QE from arch/powerpc to drivers/soc")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
---
v2: new patch
MAINTAINERS | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS
MAINTAINERS lacks of proper coverage for FSL headers. Fix it accordingly.
Fixes: 1b48706f027c ("MAINTAINERS: add entry for Freescale SoC drivers")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
---
v2: new patch
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index
Nicholas Piggin writes:
> Allow the LPID bit width and partition table size to be set at runtime
> from the device tree.
>
> Move the PID bit width detection into the same place.
>
> KVM does not support using different sizes yet, this is mainly required
> to get the PTCR register values
On 10/11/2021 17.23, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Currently struct of_device_id is 196 (32-bit) or 200 (64-bit) bytes
> large. It contains fixed-size strings for a name, a type, and a
> compatible value, but the first two are barely used.
> OF device ID tables contain multiple entries, plus an
Le 10/11/2021 à 00:47, Finn Thain a écrit :
From: Christophe Leroy
The conversion from __copy_from_user() to __get_user() introduced a
regression in __get_user_sigset() in v5.13. The bug was subsequently
copied and pasted in unsafe_get_user_sigset().
The regression was reported by users of
Currently struct of_device_id is 196 (32-bit) or 200 (64-bit) bytes
large. It contains fixed-size strings for a name, a type, and a
compatible value, but the first two are barely used.
OF device ID tables contain multiple entries, plus an empty sentinel
entry.
Statistics for my current kernel
Commit 5d354dc35ebb ("powerpc/83xx/mpc8349emitx: Make
mcu_gpiochip_remove() return void") removed the usage of the variable
ret, but failed to remove the variable itself, resulting in:
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mcu_mpc8349emitx.c: In function
‘mcu_remove’:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 02:36:42PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 08.11.2021 14:22, Jonathan Neuschäfer пишет:
> > On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 08:42:33PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > [...]
> >> EC drivers tend to use higher priority in general. Jonathan, could you
> >> please confirm that NTXEC
On 04. 11. 21, 14:06, Xianting Tian wrote:
OTOH, you need c[N_OUTBUF] in the console case (hvc_console_print), but
not whole hvc_struct. So cons_hvcs should be an array of structs
composed of only the lock and the buffer.
It is ok for me.
=
And I would do it even simpler now. One
When kernel.h is used in the headers it adds a lot into dependency hell,
especially when there are circular dependencies are involved.
Replace kernel.h inclusion with the list of what is really being used.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
---
v2: updated Cc list based on previous changes to
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 10:28:01AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Saturday, October 30, 2021, Christophe Leroy
> wrote:
> > Le 29/10/2021 à 22:31, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
...
> > That means that Michael considered it is not for him.
> >
> > And I think the reason is that in MAINTAINERS
Hi folks,
Thanks to suggestions from Mike, Frederic and Marco I ended up with
something that looks somewhat sane and with a minimal amount of crud.
Patches
===
o Patch 1 is the meat of the topic and could be picked on its own if the
rest is too icky.
o Patch 2 introduces helpers for the
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:24:48 +
Valentin Schneider wrote:
> Per PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, checking CONFIG_PREEMPT doesn't tell you the actual
> preemption model of the live kernel. Use the newly-introduced accessors
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 14
On 09 November 2021 at 03:45 pm, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The Nemo board [1] doesn't recognize any ATA disks with the pci-v5.16
updates [2].
>
> Error messages:
>
> ata4.00: gc timeout cmd 0xec
> ata4.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, error_mask=0x4)
> ata1.00: gc timeout cmd
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:07:24PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 09 November 2021 at 03:45 pm, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The Nemo board [1] doesn't recognize any ATA disks with the pci-v5.16
> updates [2].
> >
> > Error messages:
> >
> > ata4.00: gc timeout cmd 0xec
> >
Hi Rasmus,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 5:51 PM Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
> On 10/11/2021 17.23, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Currently struct of_device_id is 196 (32-bit) or 200 (64-bit) bytes
> > large. It contains fixed-size strings for a name, a type, and a
> > compatible value, but the first two
HI all,
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:41:06 +,
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:07:24PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > On 09 November 2021 at 03:45 pm, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > The Nemo board [1] doesn't recognize any ATA disks with the pci-v5.16
In panic path, fadump is triggered via a panic notifier function.
Before calling panic notifier functions, smp_send_stop() gets called,
which stops all CPUs except the panic'ing CPU. Commit 8389b37dffdc
("powerpc: stop_this_cpu: remove the cpu from the online map.") and
again commit bab26238bbd4
Per PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, checking CONFIG_PREEMPT doesn't tell you the actual
preemption model of the live kernel. Use the newly-introduced accessors
instead.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 14 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git
Per PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, checking CONFIG_PREEMPT doesn't tell you the actual
preemption model of the live kernel. Use the newly-introduced accessors
instead.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider
---
kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Commit c597bfddc9e9 ("sched: Provide Kconfig support for default dynamic
preempt mode") changed the selectable config names for the preemption
model. This means a config file must now select
CONFIG_PREEMPT_BEHAVIOUR=y
rather than
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
to get a preemptible kernel. This means all
Per PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, checking CONFIG_PREEMPT doesn't tell you the actual
preemption model of the live kernel. Use the newly-introduced accessors
instead.
sched_init() -> preempt_dynamic_init() happens way before IRQs are set up,
so this should be fine.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider
---
CONFIG_PREEMPT{_NONE, _VOLUNTARY} designate either:
o The build-time preemption model when !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
o The default boot-time preemption model when PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
IOW, using those on PREEMPT_DYNAMIC kernels is meaningless - the actual
model could have been set to something else by the
> [+CC Adding Robert for visibility]
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Thank you looking at this! Much appreciated.
>
> > > > You could attach the kernel config there, too, since it didn't make it
> > > > to the mailing list (vger may discard them -- see
> > > > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html).
> > >
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 10/11/2021 à 00:47, Finn Thain a écrit :
>
> > Christophe, I hope this change is the one you wanted to see upstream
> > (?). If it is acceptable please add your signed-off-by tag.
>
> I'm on holidays, I was planing to handle this next week.
>
10.11.2021 13:43, Jonathan Neuschäfer пишет:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 02:36:42PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 08.11.2021 14:22, Jonathan Neuschäfer пишет:
>>> On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 08:42:33PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> [...]
EC drivers tend to use higher priority in general.
On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 20:24 +, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 5f8db54226af..0640d5622496 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2073,6 +2073,22 @@ static inline void cond_resched_rcu(void)
>
On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 04:16 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 20:24 +, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index 5f8db54226af..0640d5622496 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> >
Hi Geert,
On 11/10/21 11:23 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Currently struct of_device_id is 196 (32-bit) or 200 (64-bit) bytes
> large. It contains fixed-size strings for a name, a type, and a
> compatible value, but the first two are barely used.
> OF device ID tables contain multiple entries,
Valentin Schneider writes:
> Per PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, checking CONFIG_PREEMPT doesn't tell you the actual
> preemption model of the live kernel. Use the newly-introduced accessors
> instead.
>
> sched_init() -> preempt_dynamic_init() happens way before IRQs are set up,
> so this should be fine.
On 10 November 2021 at 08:09 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
HI all,
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:41:06 +,
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:07:24PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
On 09 November 2021 at 03:45 pm, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hello,
The Nemo board [1] doesn't recognize
On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 04:47 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> So I suppose the powerpc spot should remain CONFIG_PREEMPT and become
> CONFIG_PREEMPTION when the RT change gets merged, because that spot is
> about full preemptibility, not a distinct preemption model.
KCSAN needs a little help to be
Hari Bathini writes:
> In panic path, fadump is triggered via a panic notifier function.
> Before calling panic notifier functions, smp_send_stop() gets called,
> which stops all CPUs except the panic'ing CPU. Commit 8389b37dffdc
> ("powerpc: stop_this_cpu: remove the cpu from the online map.")
On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 04:35 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 04:16 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 20:24 +, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > index 5f8db54226af..0640d5622496 100644
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 05:24:52 +,
Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>
> On 10 November 2021 at 08:09 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > HI all,
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:41:06 +,
> > Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:07:24PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> >>> On 09 November
On 11 November 2021 at 08:13 am, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 05:24:52 +,
Christian Zigotzky wrote:
On 10 November 2021 at 08:09 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
HI all,
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:41:06 +,
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:07:24PM +0100, Christian
37 matches
Mail list logo
