Re: MPC5200B, many FEC_IEVENT_RFIFO_ERRORs until link down

2010-04-05 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Hallo Roman, Roman Fietze wrote: Hallo Wolfgang, On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:15:47 Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: I just sent out the patch. Thanks a lot. Would be nice if you, or somebody else, could do some testing and provide some feedback. I tested the patches with the

[PATCH 1/2] powerpc: 83xx: add RTC drivers in 83xx defconfig

2010-04-05 Thread Kim Phillips
83xx boards typically have the DS1307 or DS1374: git grep RTC_DRV arch/powerpc/configs/*83* | grep =y arch/powerpc/configs/83xx/asp8347_defconfig:CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1374=y arch/powerpc/configs/83xx/mpc8313_rdb_defconfig:CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307=y

[PATCH 2/2] powerpc: 83xx: enable EPOLL syscall in defconfig

2010-04-05 Thread Kim Phillips
83xx users looking to run apache will experience this error: /var/log/apache2/error.log: [emerg] (38)Function not implemented: Couldn't create pollset in child; check system or user limits enabling CONFIG_EPOLL in kernel config fixes this so apache can run. Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips

Re: [PATCH v2] PowerPC/FSL/CPM: Configure clock correctly for SCC

2010-04-05 Thread Scott Wood
Wolfgang Ocker wrote: Some board setup functions call cpm1_clk_setup() or cmp2_clk_setup() to configure the clock source. If CPM_CLK_RTX has been used for the parameter mode, the clock has been configured only for TX but not for RX. With this patch CPM_CLK_RTX configures the clock for both

Re: [PATCH] [V2] Add non-Virtex5 support for LL TEMAC driver

2010-04-05 Thread Grant Likely
David, are you going to pick up this patch, or would you like me to? Thanks, g On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:05 PM, John Linn john.l...@xilinx.com wrote: This patch adds support for using the LL TEMAC Ethernet driver on

Re: [PATCH] [V2] Add non-Virtex5 support for LL TEMAC driver

2010-04-05 Thread David Miller
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:10:51 -0600 David, are you going to pick up this patch, or would you like me to? The submitter, when asked, stated that he couldn't even get the driver to build on microblaze against mainline. So I marked the patch changed

Re: [PATCH] [V2] Add non-Virtex5 support for LL TEMAC driver

2010-04-05 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:16 PM, David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote: From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:10:51 -0600 David, are you going to pick up this patch, or would you like me to? The submitter, when asked, stated that he couldn't even get the

RE: [PATCH] [V2] Add non-Virtex5 support for LL TEMAC driver

2010-04-05 Thread John Linn
-Original Message- From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 1:17 PM To: grant.lik...@secretlab.ca Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; john.willi...@petalogix.com; michal.si...@petalogix.com;

Re: Migrating from ppc to powerpc

2010-04-05 Thread Shawn Jin
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.cawrote: What processor/board/soc are you using? The easiest path is to start with a similar board and adapt the device tree source file (.dts in arch/powerpc/boot/dts) to match your board with your devices. You'll need to

[PATCH] [V3] Add non-Virtex5 support for LL TEMAC driver

2010-04-05 Thread John Linn
This patch adds support for using the LL TEMAC Ethernet driver on non-Virtex 5 platforms by adding support for accessing the Soft DMA registers as if they were memory mapped instead of solely through the DCR's (available on the Virtex 5). The patch also updates the driver so that it runs on the

Re: [PATCH] [V3] Add non-Virtex5 support for LL TEMAC driver

2010-04-05 Thread Eric Dumazet
Le lundi 05 avril 2010 à 15:11 -0600, John Linn a écrit : This patch adds support for using the LL TEMAC Ethernet driver on non-Virtex 5 platforms by adding support for accessing the Soft DMA registers as if they were memory mapped instead of solely through the DCR's (available on the Virtex

RE: [PATCH] [V2] Add non-Virtex5 support for LL TEMAC driver

2010-04-05 Thread John Linn
-Original Message- From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 1:17 PM To: grant.lik...@secretlab.ca Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; john.willi...@petalogix.com; michal.si...@petalogix.com;

RE: [PATCH] [V3] Add non-Virtex5 support for LL TEMAC driver

2010-04-05 Thread John Linn
-Original Message- From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.duma...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 3:30 PM To: John Linn Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; grant.lik...@secretlab.ca; jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; john.willi...@petalogix.com;

Re: [PATCH 1/4] panic: Allow warnings to set different taint flags

2010-04-05 Thread Helge Deller
On 04/03/2010 08:34 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: WARN() is used in some places to report firmware or hardware bugs that are then worked-around. These bugs do not affect the stability of the kernel and should not set the flag for TAINT_WARN. To allow for this, add WARN_TAINT() and

Re: [PATCH 1/4] panic: Allow warnings to set different taint flags

2010-04-05 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 07:34:56PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: WARN() is used in some places to report firmware or hardware bugs that are then worked-around. These bugs do not affect the stability of the kernel and should not set the flag for TAINT_WARN. To allow for this, add WARN_TAINT()

Re: [PATCH 33/37] sound/soc: use .dev.of_node instead of .node in struct of_device

2010-04-05 Thread Ben Dooks
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:06:50AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: .node is being removed Signed-off-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca --- sound/soc/fsl/mpc8610_hpcd.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc8610_hpcd.c

Re: [PATCH 33/37] sound/soc: use .dev.of_node instead of .node in struct of_device

2010-04-05 Thread Grant Likely
Hi Ben, thanks for the comment. Reply below... On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Ben Dooks ben-li...@fluff.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:06:50AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: .node is being removed [...] --- a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc8610_hpcd.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc8610_hpcd.c @@ -202,7

Re: [PATCH] [V3] Add non-Virtex5 support for LL TEMAC driver

2010-04-05 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 3:11 PM, John Linn john.l...@xilinx.com wrote: This patch adds support for using the LL TEMAC Ethernet driver on non-Virtex 5 platforms by adding support for accessing the Soft DMA registers as if they were memory mapped instead of solely through the DCR's (available on

Re: I can not get my MII working on MPC8247 with Linux 2.6.32.6

2010-04-05 Thread Peter Pan
I've checked the TA bit. The TA bit is 11 which means the TA bit is not correct. I changed the code to not verify the TA bit, It still returns all ones. Then I printed out all the values get. All that I get is 1. I'm going to check the MDIO with a oscilloscope. Thanks paul, you give me another way