[ pulled in a few additional patches, and fixed the fsl_pci change to
build on ppc64 platforms as well ]
The following changes since commit dc28518f7d7dfd93cd44edb44f9b8e961f5a5c1b:
powerpc: Fix doorbell type shift (2011-06-20 11:21:48 +1000)
are available in the git repository at:
P2040RDB Specification:
---
2Gbyte unbuffered DDR3 SDRAM SO-DIMM(64bit bus)
128 Mbyte NOR flash single-chip memory
256 Kbit M24256 I2C EEPROM
16 Mbyte SPI memory
SD connector to interface with the SD memory card
dTSEC1: connected to the Vitesse SGMII PHY (VSC8221)
dTSEC2:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:31:05PM +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:47:13PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2011/06/24 19:29), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 17:21 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
Hi,
When I use kprobe to do something, I found
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:14:07AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
- if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
amcc,ppc460ex-crypto)) {
+ if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
amcc,ppc460ex-crypto) ||
+ of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
amcc,ppc460gt-crypto)) {
If the
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:14:07AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
- if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
amcc,ppc460ex-crypto)) {
+ if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
amcc,ppc460ex-crypto) ||
+
Hi Ben,
A small pull request to add some DTS entries to bind to the new HW RNG
driver for 4xx.
I know Eric has the Bluegene stuff being worked on, and there are
patches from Michal Simek for relocatable kernel support out for RFC. I
need to review those a bit more closely, so they will probably
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:14:13PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 20:36 +0800, Andrew Buckeridge wrote:
Package: linux-image-3.0.0-rc3-powerpc
Version: 3.0.0~rc3-1~experimental.1
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:01:38 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 16:11 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
My access to a 32bit powerpc box is very limited. Also, embedded powerpc
has had issues with gcc-4.6 while gcc-4.5 worked fine.
I'd work to debug this too, but I don't have access to a 32bit ppc
either. Although I've been
The *p variable is declared and used to save inb-ptr, however p is
later never used. This has been the case since commit 6c0f3676 and can
lead to build failures with -Werror=unused-but-set-variable:
flattree.c: In function 'flat_read_mem_reserve':
flattree.c:700:14: error:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 09:42:53AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
The *p variable is declared and used to save inb-ptr, however p is
later never used. This has been the case since commit 6c0f3676 and can
lead to build failures with -Werror=unused-but-set-variable:
flattree.c: In function
The *p variable is declared and used to save inb-ptr, however p is
later never used. This has been the case since commit 6c0f3676 and can
lead to build failures with -Werror=unused-but-set-variable:
flattree.c: In function 'flat_read_mem_reserve':
flattree.c:700:14: error:
Commit 376ab6f2 removed the old style check functionality from DTC,
however the check option and variable were not removed. This leads to
build failures when -Werror=unused-but-set-variable is specified:
dtc.c: In function 'main':
dtc.c:102:17: error: variable 'check' set but not
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 04:17:24PM -0700, tmarri at apm.com wrote:
+choice
+ prompt DWC Mode Selection
+ depends on USB_DWC_OTG
+ default DWC_HOST_ONLY
+ help
+ Select the DWC Core in OTG, Host only, or Device only mode.
+
+config DWC_HOST_ONLY
+ bool DWC Host Only Mode
+
+config
Any boot ideas ?
Will the FCM load 2k and run it?
Thanks for any insight you might have.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:45:43 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 16:56 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
As is done in read_tsc() on x86, make sure that we don't return a timebase
value smaller than cycle_last, which can happen on SMP if the timebases
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:35:12 -0400
Mike Hench mhe...@elutions.com wrote:
Any boot ideas ?
Will the FCM load 2k and run it?
The 4K boot region will have to be split over pages 0 and 2 (2k view) or
the first half of pages 0 and 1 (4k view).
-Scott
From: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
This:
vma-vm_pgoff ~(huge_page_mask(h) PAGE_SHIFT)
is incorrect on 32-bit. It causes us to the pgoff with
something that looks like this (for a 4m hugepage): 0xfff003ff.
The mask should be flipped and *then* shifted, to give you
0x_03fff.
From: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
This is needed on HIGHMEM systems - we don't always have a virtual
address so store the physical address and map it in as needed.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
---
include/linux/hugetlb.h |3 +++
mm/hugetlb.c|
From: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
This has been broken for a while but hasn't been an issue until
now because nobody was reserving regions at high addresses.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
---
arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+),
From: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
This is used to round-robin TLBCAM entries.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h |5 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c |4
arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c |9 +
From: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
Enable hugepages on Freescale BookE processors. This allows the kernel to
use huge TLB entries to map pages, which can greatly reduce the number of
TLB misses and the amount of TLB thrashing experienced by applications with
large memory footprints.
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 14:54 -0500, Becky Bruce wrote:
struct page *alloc_huge_page_node(struct hstate *h, int nid);
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 6402458..2db81ea 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1105,8 +1105,14 @@ static void __init
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 03:24:44PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Please check the result and send any fixup patch that might be
necessary.
+static int ppc4xx_setup_pcieh_hw(struct platform_device *dev,
+struct resource res, struct ppc4xx_msi *msi)
+{
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:31 -0500, Ayman El-Khashab wrote:
+static int ppc4xx_setup_pcieh_hw(struct platform_device *dev,
+struct resource res, struct
ppc4xx_msi *msi)
+{
+
snip
+
+ msi-msi_dev = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, ppc4xx-msi);
+
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:14 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
You are applying a bandage on a wooden leg here userspace (vDSO)
will see the time going backward if you aren't well synchronized as
well, so you're stuffed anyways.
Sure -- but we should avoid turning a slight backwards drift into
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:25:08 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:14 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
You are applying a bandage on a wooden leg here userspace (vDSO)
will see the time going backward if you aren't well synchronized as
well,
Ok two things. One is first fix the comments then to stop mentioning
TSC :-)
Doh, sorry...
Second is, I still don't think it's right. There's an expectation on
powerpc that the timebase works properly. If not, you have a userspace
visible breakage.
As the changelog notes, this
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 06:31 -0500, Ayman El-Khashab wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:19:56PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 18:52 -0500, Ayman El-Khashab wrote:
I noticed during a recent development with the 460SX that a
simple device that once worked stopped.
Before I comment on this last one, a quick Q. for Dave: Do you want to
handle this or should I merge it via powerpc.git ? (It depends on
another change to the arch code to expose the SCOM functions that it
uses, and that patch is going to be in my -next branch).
Now some remaining small nits:
On
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 10:57 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
The macro MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE is currently defined twice in two .c
files, and I need it in a third one to fix a powerpc bug, so let's
first move it into a header
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:28:30PM +1000, Ben Herrenschmidt wrote:
Before I comment on this last one, a quick Q. for Dave: Do you want to
handle this or should I merge it via powerpc.git ? (It depends on
another change to the arch code to expose the SCOM functions that it
uses, and that
Hello,
I am new to the powerpc architecture and I am trying to use
perf_event_open() system call for power pc architecture (e500mc) using
2.6.32 kernel distribution. Is this system call number supported for power
pc architecture? If yes, is there something similar to
On 06/03/11 19:23, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Suzuki Poulose wrote:
The way you setup the 1:1 mapping should be close to what you are doing on
kernel entry.Isn't it possible to include the file here and in the entry
code?
I will make this change and resend the patch.
I took a look at
33 matches
Mail list logo
