@@ -883,14 +883,19 @@ static int ldo_regulator_register(struct
snd_soc_codec *codec,
struct regulator_init_data *init_data,
int voltage)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SND_SOC_FSL_SGTL5000
+ return 0;
+#else
dev_err(codec-dev, this
+static struct snd_pcm_hardware snd_fsl_hardware = {
+ .info = SNDRV_PCM_INFO_INTERLEAVED |
+ SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BLOCK_TRANSFER |
+ SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP |
+ SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP_VALID |
+ SNDRV_PCM_INFO_PAUSE |
+ SNDRV_PCM_INFO_RESUME,
Hi Rob,
After merging the dt-rh tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/rng.c: In function 'rng_init_per_cpu':
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/rng.c:64:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'of_get_ibm_chip_id'
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:00:33AM +0200, Victor Kaplansky wrote:
Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote on 10/25/2013 07:37:49 PM:
I would argue for:
READ -data_tail READ -data_head
smp_rmb() (A) smp_rmb() (C)
WRITE $data READ $data
2013/10/25 Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 03:19:51PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
I would argue for:
READ -data_tail READ -data_head
smp_rmb() (A) smp_rmb() (C)
WRITE $data
Hi,
for quite some time the following is printed (twice) after doing
make oldconfig:
[...]
scripts/kconfig/conf --oldconfig Kconfig
warning: (ADB_PMU_LED_IDE) selects LEDS_TRIGGER_IDE_DISK which has unmet direct
dependencies (NEW_LEDS IDE_GD_ATA LEDS_TRIGGERS)
warning: (ADB_PMU_LED_IDE)
From: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
2013/10/25 Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 03:19:51PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
I would argue for
READ -data_tail READ -data_head
smp_rmb() (A) smp_rmb()
Hi,
during make ppc6xx_defconfig the following happens:
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
GEN /usr/local/src/tmp/lnx/Makefile
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
arch/powerpc/configs/ppc6xx_defconfig:74:warning: symbol value
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:38:29PM +0200, Victor Kaplansky wrote:
2013/10/25 Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 03:19:51PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
I would argue for
READ -data_tail READ -data_head
smp_rmb() (A)
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:37:38PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
kernel/sched/core.c |5 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 38 --
kernel/sched/sched.h |1 +
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c
* Michael Ellerman (mich...@ellerman.id.au) wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:25:07PM -0500, Robert C Jennings wrote:
Move the few declarations from arch/powerpc/kernel/setup.h
into arch/powerpc/include/asm/setup.h. This resolves a
sparse warning for arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c which defines
Simple fixes for sparse warnings in this file.
Resolves:
arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c:198:24:
warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c:1157:5:
warning: symbol 'hot_add_node_scn_to_nid' was not declared.
Should it be static?
Cleaning out some stashed fixes for sparse warnings found while
working on 3be7db6: (powerpc: VPHN topology change updates all siblings)
I don't see a reason why the declarations in arch/powerpc/kernel/setup.h
can't live in arch/powerpc/include/asm/setup.h and .../mm/numa.c
should include these
Move the few declarations from arch/powerpc/kernel/setup.h
into arch/powerpc/include/asm/setup.h. This resolves a
sparse warning for arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c which defines
do_init_bootmem() but can't include the setup.h header
in the prior path.
Resolves:
arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c:998:13:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 05:15:02PM +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
From: Preeti U Murthy pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The current logic in load balance is such that after picking the
busiest group, the load is attempted to be moved from the busiest cpu
in that group to the dst_cpu. If the
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:26:34PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:38:29PM +0200, Victor Kaplansky wrote:
2013/10/25 Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 03:19:51PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
I would argue for
READ
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:25 -0500, James Yang wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Scott Wood wrote:
Has anyone measured how much this slows things down with a typical
userspace?
Not a measurement of the patch in question but an older similar patch
on 3.0.51 (8572 running Debian 5.0.3):
$
On 10/28, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Lets add Paul and Oleg to the thread; this is getting far more 'fun'
that it should be ;-)
Heh. All I can say is that I would like to see the authoritative answer,
you know who can shed a light ;)
But to avoid the confusion, wmb() added by this patch looks
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 13:58 +0800, Lian Minghuan-b31939 wrote:
Hi Kumar,
please see my comment inline.
On 10/24/2013 12:11 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Minghuan Lian wrote:
PowerPC uses structure pci_controller to describe PCI controller,
but ARM uses structure
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
JFYI, when comparing v3.12-rc7 to v3.12-rc6[3], the summaries are:
- build errors: +9/-10
+ /scratch/kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c: error: 'associativity'
may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized]: =
On 10/28, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:26:34PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
@@ -87,10 +87,31 @@ static void perf_output_put_handle(struc
goto out;
/*
-
Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote on 10/28/2013 10:17:35 PM:
mb(); // : do we really need it? I think yes.
Oh, it is hard to argue with feelings. Also, it is easy to be on
conservative side and put the barrier here just in case.
But I still insist that the barrier is redundant
On 10/27/2013 05:06 PM, Peter Hüwe wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone here on this list still has a machine with an old
ATMEL TPM (trusted platform module) lying around?
From the kconfig entry it becomes evident that it was only supported on ppc64
machines.
config TCG_ATMEL
On 10/28/2013 03:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Rob,
After merging the dt-rh tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/rng.c: In function
'rng_init_per_cpu': arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/rng.c:64:2:
error: implicit
Am Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013, 00:47:45 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:03:43PM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
On 10/27/2013 05:06 PM, Peter H?we wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone here on this list still has a machine with an
old ATMEL TPM (trusted platform
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:03:43PM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
On 10/27/2013 05:06 PM, Peter H?we wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone here on this list still has a machine with an old
ATMEL TPM (trusted platform module) lying around?
From the kconfig entry it becomes evident that it
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:43:17AM -0700, York Sun wrote:
Enable CONFIG_MTD_M25P80 for corenet64_smp_defconfig. Verified on
P5040DS.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
Reviewed-by: Wood Scott-B07421 scottw...@freescale.com
Reviewed-by: Fleming Andrew-AFLEMING
On 10/28/2013 05:28 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:43:17AM -0700, York Sun wrote:
Enable CONFIG_MTD_M25P80 for corenet64_smp_defconfig. Verified on
P5040DS.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
Reviewed-by: Wood Scott-B07421 scottw...@freescale.com
Reviewed-by:
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 09:07 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
Hi Ben,
This patch is present in upstream review list from a long time.
There are no review comments.
So, I request you to pick this patch-set for powerpc.git repository.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/280207/
Sorry again for the lateness. I tried to get this done before the
conferences last week, but it just didn't happen.
Highlights include corenet board file consolidation, the ability to run
userspaces with lwsync on e500v1/v2, some cleanup patches that other KVM
patches will build on, support for
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 21:44 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Sorry again for the lateness. I tried to get this done before the
conferences last week, but it just didn't happen.
Highlights include corenet board file consolidation, the ability to run
userspaces with lwsync on e500v1/v2, some cleanup
Commit 9863c28a2af90a56c088f5f6288d7f6d2c923c14 (powerpc: Emulate sync
instruction variants) introduced a build breakage with
CONFIG_PPC_EMULATED_STATS enabled.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
Cc: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.org
Cc: James Yang james.y...@freescale.com
---
---
On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 21:55 -0500, Tang Yuantian-B29983 wrote:
I didn't see how your suggestion is a better matching.
OSC PLL1 mux CPU
| |
|-- PLL2 --|
As your suggestion, the clock tree looks like the above.
In this case, the MUX
Hi Peter,
On 10/28/2013 07:20 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:37:38PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
kernel/sched/core.c |5 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 38 --
kernel/sched/sched.h |1 +
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+),
On 10/29/2013 6:41 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 09:07 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
Hi Ben,
This patch is present in upstream review list from a long time.
There are no review comments.
So, I request you to pick this patch-set for powerpc.git repository.
+static struct snd_pcm_hardware snd_fsl_hardware = {
+ .info = SNDRV_PCM_INFO_INTERLEAVED |
+ SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BLOCK_TRANSFER |
+ SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP |
+ SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP_VALID |
+ SNDRV_PCM_INFO_PAUSE |
+ SNDRV_PCM_INFO_RESUME,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:00:57PM +0800, Xiubo Li-B47053 wrote:
There's a patch in -next that lets the generic dmaengine code figure out
some settings from the dmacontroller rather than requiring the driver to
explicitly provide configuration - it's ASoC: dmaengine-pcm: Provide
default
Commit c55aef0e5bc6 (powerpc/boot: Change the load address for the
wrapper to fit the kernel) adjusts the wrapper address unnecessarily
for platforms that use arch/powerpc/boot/of.c, since the code there
allocates space for the kernel wherever it can find it and doesn't
necessarily load the kernel
Hi Peter,
On 10/28/2013 09:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 05:15:02PM +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
From: Preeti U Murthy pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The current logic in load balance is such that after picking the
busiest group, the load is attempted to be moved
39 matches
Mail list logo
