RE: [v7, 0/5] Fix eSDHC host version register bug

2016-04-05 Thread Yangbo Lu
> -Original Message- > From: Ulf Hansson [mailto:ulf.hans...@linaro.org] > Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 7:28 PM > To: Yangbo Lu > Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; > linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux- > c...@vger.kernel.o

Re: [PATCH 14/65] powerpc/mm/power9: Add partition table format

2016-04-05 Thread Balbir Singh
On 27/03/16 19:23, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > We also add mach dep call back for updating partition table entry. The changelog needs to be enhanced. > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h | 31 +-- > arch/powerpc/include/asm

Re: [PATCH kernel v2] powerpc/powernv/npu: Enable NVLink pass through

2016-04-05 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 04/06/2016 12:41 PM, David Gibson wrote: On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:45:34AM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: Ping? On 03/24/2016 12:42 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: IBM POWER8 NVlink systems come with Tesla K40-ish GPUs each of which also has a couple of fast speed links (NVLink). The i

Re: [RFC v5 7/7] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap MSI-X table if interrupt remapping is supported

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
On 2016/4/6 8:00, Gavin Shan wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:46:44PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote: This patch enables mmapping MSI-X tables if hardware supports interrupt remapping which can ensure that a given pci device can only shoot the MSIs assigned for it. Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie --- driv

Re: [RFC v5 6/7] PCI: Add a new bit to pci_bus_flags to indicate interrupt remapping

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
On 2016/4/6 8:11, Gavin Shan wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:46:43PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote: I'm trying to find a proper way to indicate the capability of interrupt remapping on PPC64 because we need this to determine whether it is safe to mmap MSI-X table in VFIO driver. There is a existing

Re: [RFC v5 3/7] PCI: Add a new option for resource_alignment to reassign alignment

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
On 2016/4/6 9:43, Gavin Shan wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:43:31PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote: When using resource_alignment kernel parameter, the current implement reassigns the alignment by changing resources' size which can potentially break some drivers. For example, the driver uses the siz

Re: [PATCH kernel v2] powerpc/powernv/npu: Enable NVLink pass through

2016-04-05 Thread David Gibson
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:45:34AM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > Ping? > > On 03/24/2016 12:42 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > >IBM POWER8 NVlink systems come with Tesla K40-ish GPUs each of which > >also has a couple of fast speed links (NVLink). The interface to links > >is exposed as a

Re: [RFC v5 1/7] PCI: Ignore resource_alignment if PCI_PROBE_ONLY was set

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
On 2016/4/6 8:48, Gavin Shan wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:43:29PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote: The resource_alignment will releases memory resources allocated by firmware so that kernel can reassign new resources later on. But this will cause the problem that no resources can be allocated by ke

Re: [RFC v5 2/7] PCI: Do not Use IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN to identify bridge resources

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
On 2016/4/6 8:55, Gavin Shan wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:43:30PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote: Now we use the IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN to identify bridge resources in __assign_resources_sorted(). That's quite fragile. We can't make sure that the PCI devices' resources will not use IORESOURCE_START

Re: [PATCH kernel v2] powerpc/powernv/npu: Enable NVLink pass through

2016-04-05 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
Ping? On 03/24/2016 12:42 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: IBM POWER8 NVlink systems come with Tesla K40-ish GPUs each of which also has a couple of fast speed links (NVLink). The interface to links is exposed as an emulated PCI bridge which is included into the same IOMMU group as the correspond

Re: [RFC v5 3/7] PCI: Add a new option for resource_alignment to reassign alignment

2016-04-05 Thread Gavin Shan
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:43:31PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote: >When using resource_alignment kernel parameter, >the current implement reassigns the alignment by >changing resources' size which can potentially >break some drivers. For example, the driver uses >the size to locate some register whose le

Re: [RFC v5 2/7] PCI: Do not Use IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN to identify bridge resources

2016-04-05 Thread Gavin Shan
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:43:30PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote: >Now we use the IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN to identify >bridge resources in __assign_resources_sorted(). >That's quite fragile. We can't make sure that >the PCI devices' resources will not use >IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN any more. > >In this patch,

Re: [RFC v5 1/7] PCI: Ignore resource_alignment if PCI_PROBE_ONLY was set

2016-04-05 Thread Gavin Shan
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:43:29PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote: >The resource_alignment will releases memory >resources allocated by firmware so that kernel >can reassign new resources later on. But this >will cause the problem that no resources can be >allocated by kernel if PCI_PROBE_ONLY was set, >e

Re: [RFC v5 6/7] PCI: Add a new bit to pci_bus_flags to indicate interrupt remapping

2016-04-05 Thread Gavin Shan
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:46:43PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote: >I'm trying to find a proper way to indicate >the capability of interrupt remapping on PPC64 >because we need this to determine whether it is >safe to mmap MSI-X table in VFIO driver. > >There is a existing flag for this in the IOMMU >spac

Re: [RFC v5 7/7] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap MSI-X table if interrupt remapping is supported

2016-04-05 Thread Gavin Shan
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:46:44PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote: >This patch enables mmapping MSI-X tables if >hardware supports interrupt remapping which >can ensure that a given pci device can only >shoot the MSIs assigned for it. > >Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie >--- > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c

Re: [PATCH 12/65] powerpc/mm: Use generic version of ptep_clear_flush_young

2016-04-05 Thread Balbir Singh
On 27/03/16 19:23, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > The radix variant is going to require a flush_tlb_range. With > flush_tlb_range added, ptep_clear_flush_young is same as the generic > version. So drop the powerpc specific variant > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V > The changelog is same as 11/65..

Re: [net-next PATCH 2/2 v4] ibmvnic: enable RX checksum offload

2016-04-05 Thread David Miller
From: Thomas Falcon Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:20:35 -0500 > Enable RX Checksum offload feature in the ibmvnic driver. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Falcon Applied. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listi

Re: [net-next PATCH 1/2 v4] ibmvnic: map L2/L3/L4 header descriptors to firmware

2016-04-05 Thread David Miller
From: Thomas Falcon Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:20:34 -0500 > Allow the VNIC driver to provide descriptors containing > L2/L3/L4 headers to firmware. This feature is needed > for greater hardware compatibility and enablement of checksum > and TCP offloading features. > > A new function is include

Re: [PATCH 11/65] powerpc/mm: Use generic version of pmdp_clear_flush_young

2016-04-05 Thread Balbir Singh
On 27/03/16 19:23, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > The radix variant is going to require a flush_pmd_tlb_range. With > flush_pmd_tlb_range added, pmdp_clear_flush_young is same as the generic > version. So drop the powerpc specific variant > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V > Make sense, what happens

Re: powerpc: Clear user CPU feature bits if TM is disabled at runtime

2016-04-05 Thread Michael Ellerman
On 5 April 2016 7:56:23 pm AEST, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 19:35 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Shouldn't we be clearing the user feature there too? >> >> The ibm_pa_features array and the logic in scan_features() knows to >> flip the >> cpu_user_features bits, it

[RFC v3] powerpc/devtree: Parse new DRC mem/cpu/dev device tree elements

2016-04-05 Thread Michael Bringmann
Several properties in the DRC device tree format are replaced by more compact representations to allow, for example, for the encoding of vast amounts of memory, and or reduced duplication of information in related data structures. "ibm,drc-info": This property, when present, replaces the followin

Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

2016-04-05 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 04/05/2016 12:02 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to quickly tag the precise problem. Cc: Al

Re: [PATCH net 3/4] lib/test_bpf: Add test to check for result of 32-bit add that overflows

2016-04-05 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 04/05/2016 12:02 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: BPF_ALU32 and BPF_ALU64 tests for adding two 32-bit values that results in 32-bit overflow. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Paul Mackerras Signed-off-by: Na

Re: [PATCH net 2/4] lib/test_bpf: Add tests for unsigned BPF_JGT

2016-04-05 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 04/05/2016 12:02 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: Unsigned Jump-if-Greater-Than. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Paul Mackerras Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann ___

Re: [PATCH net 1/4] lib/test_bpf: Fix JMP_JSET tests

2016-04-05 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 04/05/2016 12:02 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: JMP_JSET tests incorrectly used BPF_JNE. Fix the same. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Paul Mackerras Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Acked-by: Daniel Borkm

[PATCH 1/1] powerpc/mm: Add memory barrier in __hugepte_alloc()

2016-04-05 Thread Sukadev Bhattiprolu
From f7b73c6b4508fe9b141a43d92be2f9dd7d3c4a58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:07:57 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] powerpc/mm: Add memory barrier in __hugepte_alloc() __hugepte_alloc() uses kmem_cache_zalloc() to allocate a zeroed PTE and proceeds to use t

Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

2016-04-05 Thread Naveen N. Rao
On 2016/04/05 09:28AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > >Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to > >sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get > >covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit te

Re: [PATCH net 2/4] lib/test_bpf: Add tests for unsigned BPF_JGT

2016-04-05 Thread Naveen N. Rao
On 2016/04/05 09:20AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > >Unsigned Jump-if-Greater-Than. > > > >Cc: Alexei Starovoitov > >Cc: Daniel Borkmann > >Cc: "David S. Miller" > >Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli > >Cc: Michael Ellerman > >Cc: Paul Mackerras > >Signed-

Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

2016-04-05 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to quickly tag the precise problem. Cc: Alexei

Re: [PATCH net 3/4] lib/test_bpf: Add test to check for result of 32-bit add that overflows

2016-04-05 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: BPF_ALU32 and BPF_ALU64 tests for adding two 32-bit values that results in 32-bit overflow. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Paul Mackerras Signed-off-by: Naveen

Re: [PATCH net 2/4] lib/test_bpf: Add tests for unsigned BPF_JGT

2016-04-05 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: Unsigned Jump-if-Greater-Than. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Paul Mackerras Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao I think some of the tests already cover it, but ext

Re: [PATCH net 1/4] lib/test_bpf: Fix JMP_JSET tests

2016-04-05 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: JMP_JSET tests incorrectly used BPF_JNE. Fix the same. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Paul Mackerras Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Good catch. Fixes: cffc642d

[RFC v5 7/7] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap MSI-X table if interrupt remapping is supported

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
This patch enables mmapping MSI-X tables if hardware supports interrupt remapping which can ensure that a given pci device can only shoot the MSIs assigned for it. Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie --- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c |9 +++-- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h |1 + dr

[RFC v5 6/7] PCI: Add a new bit to pci_bus_flags to indicate interrupt remapping

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
I'm trying to find a proper way to indicate the capability of interrupt remapping on PPC64 because we need this to determine whether it is safe to mmap MSI-X table in VFIO driver. There is a existing flag for this in the IOMMU space: enum iommu_cap { IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY, --->IOM

[RFC v5 5/7] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap sub-page MMIO BARs if the mmio page is exclusive

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs because these BARs' mmio page may be shared with other BARs. But we should allow to mmap these sub-page MMIO BARs if we can make sure these BARs' mmio page will not be shared with other BARs. To acheive that, w

[RFC v5 4/7] PCI: Add support for enforcing all MMIO BARs to be page aligned

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
When vfio passthrough a PCI device of which MMIO BARs are smaller than PAGE_SIZE, guest will not handle the mmio accesses to the BARs which leads to mmio emulations in host. This is because vfio will not allow to passthrough one BAR's mmio page which may be shared with other BARs. Otherwise, there

[RFC v5 3/7] PCI: Add a new option for resource_alignment to reassign alignment

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
When using resource_alignment kernel parameter, the current implement reassigns the alignment by changing resources' size which can potentially break some drivers. For example, the driver uses the size to locate some register whose length is related to the size. This adds a new option "noresize" f

[RFC v5 2/7] PCI: Do not Use IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN to identify bridge resources

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
Now we use the IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN to identify bridge resources in __assign_resources_sorted(). That's quite fragile. We can't make sure that the PCI devices' resources will not use IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN any more. In this patch, we try to use a more robust way to identify bridge resources. Sign

[RFC v5 1/7] PCI: Ignore resource_alignment if PCI_PROBE_ONLY was set

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
The resource_alignment will releases memory resources allocated by firmware so that kernel can reassign new resources later on. But this will cause the problem that no resources can be allocated by kernel if PCI_PROBE_ONLY was set, e.g. on pSeries platform because PCI_PROBE_ONLY force kernel to use

[RFC v5 0/7] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap sub-page MMIO BARs and MSI-X table

2016-04-05 Thread Yongji Xie
Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap sub-page(size < PAGE_SIZE) MMIO BARs and MSI-X table. This is because sub-page BARs' mmio page may be shared with other BARs and MSI-X table should not be accessed directly from the guest for security reasons. But it will easily cause some performa

Re: [PATCH 10/65] powerpc/mm: Drop WIMG in favour of new constants

2016-04-05 Thread Balbir Singh
On 27/03/16 19:23, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > PowerISA 3.0 introduce two pte bits with the below meaning w.r.t Radix > 00 -> Normal Memory > 01 -> Strong Access Order > 10 -> Non idempotent I/O (Cache inhibited and guarded) > 11 -> Tolerant I/O (Cache inhibited) > > We drop the existing WIMG bit

Re: crash in ppc4xx-rng on canyonland

2016-04-05 Thread Herbert Xu
Christian Lamparter wrote: > > The crash is caused by a bad read in ppc4xx_rng_enable [0]. From what I > can tell, the driver is mapping the crypto control registers. The > problem is that they are claimed by the main crypto driver: crypto4xx [1]. > > I'm not sure what to do in this case. In my o

Re: [PATCH 09/65] powerpc/mm: Use helper for finding pte bits mapping I/O area

2016-04-05 Thread Balbir Singh
On 27/03/16 19:23, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Use helper instead of opencoding with constants. Later patch will > drop the WIMG bits and use PowerISA 3.0 defines > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/btext.c | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/kernel/isa-bridge.c | 4 ++-- > ar

Re: [v7, 0/5] Fix eSDHC host version register bug

2016-04-05 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 1 April 2016 at 05:07, Yangbo Lu wrote: > This patchset is used to fix a host version register bug in the > T4240-R1.0-R2.0 > eSDHC controller. To get the SoC version and revision, it's needed to add the > GUTS driver to access the global utilities registers. > > So, the first three patches ar

Re: [v7, 4/5] powerpc/fsl: move mpc85xx.h to include/linux/fsl

2016-04-05 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:07:30AM +0800, Yangbo Lu wrote: > Move mpc85xx.h to include/linux/fsl and rename it to svr.h as > a common header file. It has been used for mpc85xx and it will > be used for ARM-based SoC as well. > > Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu > Acked-by: Wolfram Sang Acked-by: Joerg

[PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

2016-04-05 Thread Naveen N. Rao
Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to quickly tag the precise problem. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: "Dav

[PATCH net 2/4] lib/test_bpf: Add tests for unsigned BPF_JGT

2016-04-05 Thread Naveen N. Rao
Unsigned Jump-if-Greater-Than. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Paul Mackerras Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- lib/test_bpf.c | 29 + 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) diff

[PATCH net 3/4] lib/test_bpf: Add test to check for result of 32-bit add that overflows

2016-04-05 Thread Naveen N. Rao
BPF_ALU32 and BPF_ALU64 tests for adding two 32-bit values that results in 32-bit overflow. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Paul Mackerras Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- lib/test_bpf.c | 64 +

[PATCH net 1/4] lib/test_bpf: Fix JMP_JSET tests

2016-04-05 Thread Naveen N. Rao
JMP_JSET tests incorrectly used BPF_JNE. Fix the same. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Paul Mackerras Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- lib/test_bpf.c | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 de

Re: powerpc: Clear user CPU feature bits if TM is disabled at runtime

2016-04-05 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 19:35 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Shouldn't we be clearing the user feature there too? > > The ibm_pa_features array and the logic in scan_features() knows to > flip the > cpu_user_features bits, it was just never updated to handle > cpu_user_features2. > > So it seems

Re: [v7, 4/5] powerpc/fsl: move mpc85xx.h to include/linux/fsl

2016-04-05 Thread Ulf Hansson
- decreasing the cc list significantly On 1 April 2016 at 05:07, Yangbo Lu wrote: > Move mpc85xx.h to include/linux/fsl and rename it to svr.h as > a common header file. It has been used for mpc85xx and it will > be used for ARM-based SoC as well. > > Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu > Acked-by: Wolfram

Re: powerpc: Clear user CPU feature bits if TM is disabled at runtime

2016-04-05 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 11:11:12 UTC, Paul Mackerras via Linuxppc-dev wrote: > In check_cpu_pa_features() we check a number of bits in the Shouldn't we be clearing the user feature there too? The ibm_pa_features array and the logic in scan_features() knows to flip the cpu_user_features bits, it was

Re: [PATCH 08/65] powerpc/mm: Update _PAGE_KERNEL_RO

2016-04-05 Thread Balbir Singh
On 27/03/16 19:23, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > PS3 had used PPP bit hack to implement a read only mapping in the > kernel area. Since we are bolt mapping the ioremap area, it used > the pte flags _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_USER to get a PPP value of 0x3 > there by resulting in a read only mapping. This

Re: [PATCH] spapr: Don't set the TM ibm,pa-features bit in PR KVM mode

2016-04-05 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 04/05/2016 02:09 PM, David Gibson wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:12:01PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:09:28PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: We don't support transactional memory in PR KVM, so don't tell the OS that we do. This assumes PR KVM won't ever support

Re: PR KVM and TM issues

2016-04-05 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 04/04/2016 09:09 PM, Michael Neuling wrote: On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 17:00 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: On 04/04/2016 04:44 PM, Anton Blanchard wrote: Hi, I can't get an Ubuntu Wily guest to boot on an Ubuntu Wily host in PR KVM mode. The kernel in both cases is 4.2. To reproduce: wget