For ARM we remove the list that contains non-arm insns, and
instead add more maintainable branch instruction regex logic.
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips
Acked-by: Ravi Bangoria
Cc: Namhyung Kim
---
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 177 +
1 file changed, 67
Recent updates to the PAPR for memory hotplug has now made the
reserved field of the ibm,dynamic-memory property a capabilities
field. To support this update we can no longer use the reserved field
to track which LMBs have been updated during a DLPAR operation.
This patch adds a bitfield to track
Remove the use of the rtas_hp_event flag as it is no longer needed. the
managememnet of the static dynamic-memory property does not go through
of_update_property so we do not need to set this flag.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c |5 -
1
The ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory/ibm,dynamic-memory property
of the device-tree can be fairly big on systems with a large amount
of memory. A system with 1 TB of memory (256 MB LMBs) the property
size is 94k, this equates to roughly a 30MB property size for a 32 TB
system. This file size is n
The ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory/ibm,dynamic-memory property
of the device-tree can be fairly big on systems with a large amount
of memory. A system with 1 TB of memory (256 MB LMBs) the property
size is 94k, this equates to roughly a 30MB property size for a 32 TB
system. This file size is n
commit 7aef4136566b0 ("powerpc32: rewrite csum_partial_copy_generic()
based on copy_tofrom_user()") introduced a bug when destination
address is odd and len is lower than cacheline size.
In that case the resulting csum value doesn't have to be rotated one
byte because the cache-aligned copy part i
Hi Christophe,
On 26 August 2016 at 14:46, Christophe Leroy wrote:
[...]
> Can you try the patch below ? I have identified that in case the packet is
> smaller than a cacheline, it doesn't get cache-aligned so the result shall
> not be rotated in case of odd dest address.
>
> This patch goes in a
Hi Alessio,
Le 26/08/2016 à 04:32, Scott Wood a écrit :
On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 13:34 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 23/08/2016 à 11:20, Alessio Igor Bogani a écrit :
Hi Christophe,
Sorry for delay in reply I was on vacation.
On 6 August 2016 at 11:29, christophe leroy
wrote:
Alessio,
Hi Kim,
I've tested your patch on x86 and powerpc and it looks fine to me. Can you
please
put your signed-off-by.
Please add Act-by: Ravi Bangoria as well.
Regards,
-Ravi
On Wednesday 24 August 2016 02:06 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:17:16 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>>
Hi Scott,
thanks for the patch! This one works for my setup:
T4240, 12GB Ram and Radeon E6760.
On 2016-08-26 08:38, Scott Wood wrote:
This allows PCI devices that can only address (e.g.) 36 or 40 bit DMA
to
use direct DMA, at the cost of not being able to DMA to non-RAM
addresses
(this doesn'
10 matches
Mail list logo