Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/powernv: Initialise nest mmu
On 12/02/2016 01:24 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Alistair Popplewrites: > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h >> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h >> index da7c843..6fa9551 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h >> @@ -9,6 +9,12 @@ static inline void pnv_smp_init(void) { } >> >> struct pci_dev; >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV >> +extern void powernv_set_ptcr(unsigned long ptcr); >> +#else >> +static inline void powernv_set_ptcr(unisigned long ptcr) { } > ^ > Your shout next time we're at the > pub ;) > > cheers > Ah, the elusive unicorn of signed longs! -Tyrel
Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/powernv: Initialise nest mmu
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:24:09 PM Michael Ellerman wrote: > Alistair Popplewrites: > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h > > index da7c843..6fa9551 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h > > @@ -9,6 +9,12 @@ static inline void pnv_smp_init(void) { } > > > > struct pci_dev; > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV > > +extern void powernv_set_ptcr(unsigned long ptcr); > > +#else > > +static inline void powernv_set_ptcr(unisigned long ptcr) { } > ^ > Your shout next time we're at the > pub ;) Whoops. Guess I was too keen to get there myself. Thanks for picking that up! > cheers
Re: [PATCH] powerpc: cputime: fix a compile warning
On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 15:15 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > yanjiang@windriver.com writes: > > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h > > index 4f60db0..4423e97 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h > > @@ -228,7 +228,8 @@ static inline cputime_t clock_t_to_cputime(const > > unsigned long clk) > > return (__force cputime_t) ct; > > } > > > > -#define cputime64_to_clock_t(ct) cputime_to_clock_t((cputime_t)(ct > > )) > > +#define cputime64_to_clock_t(ct) \ > > + (__force u64)(cputime_to_clock_t((cputime_t)(ct))) > Given the name of the function is "cputime64 to clock_t", surely we > should be returning a clock_t ? That was my initial reaction but it seems that this function has meant "return a u64 that is otherwise like clock_t" since before the beginning of git history. Both generic implementations return u64, including jiffies_64_to_clock_t which does so explicitly. -Scott
Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ia64: reuse append_elf_note() and final_note() functions
Hari Bathiniwrites: > Hi Dave, > > > Thanks for the review. > > > On Thursday 01 December 2016 10:26 AM, Dave Young wrote: >> Hi Hari >> >> Personally I like V1 more, but split the patch 2 is easier for ia64 >> people to reivew. I did basic x86 testing, it runs ok. >> >> On 11/25/16 at 05:24pm, Hari Bathini wrote: >>> Get rid of multiple definitions of append_elf_note() & final_note() >>> functions. Reuse these functions compiled under CONFIG_CRASH_CORE. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini >>> --- >>> arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c | 22 -- >>> include/linux/crash_core.h |4 >>> kernel/crash_core.c|6 +++--- >>> kernel/kexec_core.c| 28 >>> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c >>> index 2955f35..75859a0 100644 >>> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c >>> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c >>> @@ -27,28 +27,6 @@ static int kdump_freeze_monarch; >>> static int kdump_on_init = 1; >>> static int kdump_on_fatal_mca = 1; >>> -static inline Elf64_Word >>> -*append_elf_note(Elf64_Word *buf, char *name, unsigned type, void *data, >>> - size_t data_len) >>> -{ >>> - struct elf_note *note = (struct elf_note *)buf; >>> - note->n_namesz = strlen(name) + 1; >>> - note->n_descsz = data_len; >>> - note->n_type = type; >>> - buf += (sizeof(*note) + 3)/4; >>> - memcpy(buf, name, note->n_namesz); >>> - buf += (note->n_namesz + 3)/4; >>> - memcpy(buf, data, data_len); >>> - buf += (data_len + 3)/4; >>> - return buf; >>> -} >>> - >>> -static void >>> -final_note(void *buf) >>> -{ >>> - memset(buf, 0, sizeof(struct elf_note)); >>> -} >>> - >> The above IA64 version looks better than the functions in kexec_core.c >> about the Elf64_Word type usage and the simpler final_note function. > > Hmmm.. Is void* better over Elf64_Word* to be agnostic of Elf32 or > Elf64 type? Both Elf64_Word and Elf32_Word result in a u32. So I expect the right solution is to add a definition of Elf_Word to include/linux/elf.h and to make the buffer "Elf_Word *buf". That way we preserve the alignment knowledge, while making the code depend on 32bit or 64bit. Eric
Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI: designware: add host_init() error handling
On 02/12/16 10:32, Joao Pinto wrote: Hi Srinivas, Às 11:51 AM de 12/1/2016, Srinivas Kandagatla escreveu: drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c | 4 +++- drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 4 +++- drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c | 4 +++- drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c | 4 +++- drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c | 12 drivers/pci/host/pcie-armada8k.c| 4 +++- drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware-plat.c | 4 +++- drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 4 +++- drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h | 2 +- drivers/pci/host/pcie-qcom.c| 6 -- drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c | 4 +++- 11 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) Thanks for the patch! In my opinion your idea is good but only qcom driver is able to detect failure in the specific host init routine, all others have a 'return 0' even if something not well init. I would recomend that we take this issue a bit further and add the error checking to all specific pci drivers in order to make them as robust as qcom'. I totally agree with you, I can give this a go in next version. Thanks, srini Thanks, Joao
Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI: designware: add host_init() error handling
Hi Srinivas, Às 11:51 AM de 12/1/2016, Srinivas Kandagatla escreveu: > drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c | 4 +++- > drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 4 +++- > drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c | 4 +++- > drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c | 4 +++- > drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c | 12 > drivers/pci/host/pcie-armada8k.c| 4 +++- > drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware-plat.c | 4 +++- > drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 4 +++- > drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h | 2 +- > drivers/pci/host/pcie-qcom.c| 6 -- > drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c | 4 +++- > 11 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > Thanks for the patch! In my opinion your idea is good but only qcom driver is able to detect failure in the specific host init routine, all others have a 'return 0' even if something not well init. I would recomend that we take this issue a bit further and add the error checking to all specific pci drivers in order to make them as robust as qcom'. Thanks, Joao
Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ia64: reuse append_elf_note() and final_note() functions
Hi Dave, Thanks for the review. On Thursday 01 December 2016 10:26 AM, Dave Young wrote: Hi Hari Personally I like V1 more, but split the patch 2 is easier for ia64 people to reivew. I did basic x86 testing, it runs ok. On 11/25/16 at 05:24pm, Hari Bathini wrote: Get rid of multiple definitions of append_elf_note() & final_note() functions. Reuse these functions compiled under CONFIG_CRASH_CORE. Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini--- arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c | 22 -- include/linux/crash_core.h |4 kernel/crash_core.c|6 +++--- kernel/kexec_core.c| 28 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c index 2955f35..75859a0 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c @@ -27,28 +27,6 @@ static int kdump_freeze_monarch; static int kdump_on_init = 1; static int kdump_on_fatal_mca = 1; -static inline Elf64_Word -*append_elf_note(Elf64_Word *buf, char *name, unsigned type, void *data, - size_t data_len) -{ - struct elf_note *note = (struct elf_note *)buf; - note->n_namesz = strlen(name) + 1; - note->n_descsz = data_len; - note->n_type = type; - buf += (sizeof(*note) + 3)/4; - memcpy(buf, name, note->n_namesz); - buf += (note->n_namesz + 3)/4; - memcpy(buf, data, data_len); - buf += (data_len + 3)/4; - return buf; -} - -static void -final_note(void *buf) -{ - memset(buf, 0, sizeof(struct elf_note)); -} - The above IA64 version looks better than the functions in kexec_core.c about the Elf64_Word type usage and the simpler final_note function. Hmmm.. Is void* better over Elf64_Word* to be agnostic of Elf32 or Elf64 type? Care to update crash_core.c to use this instead? Sure. Will resend. Thanks Hari
Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/powernv: Initialise nest mmu
> static void __init radix_init_partition_table(void) > { > - unsigned long rts_field; > + unsigned long rts_field, ptcr; I think these functions have changed, check for conflicts against http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc.git/commit/?h=kvm-ppc-next=9d66195807ac6cb8a14231fd055ff755977c5fca > > rts_field = radix__get_tree_size(); > > @@ -193,7 +194,9 @@ static void __init radix_init_partition_table(void) > * update partition table control register, > * 64 K size. > */ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV > +extern void powernv_set_ptcr(unsigned long ptcr); > +#else > +static inline void powernv_set_ptcr(unisigned long ptcr) { } Michael caught you for this already Balbir
Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64: Fix checksum folding in csum_tcpudp_nofold and ip_fast_csum_nofold
Paul Mackerraswrites: > These functions compute an IP checksum by computing a 64-bit sum and > folding it to 32 bits (the "nofold" in their names refers to folding > down to 16 bits). However, doing (u32) (s + (s >> 32)) is not > sufficient to fold a 64-bit sum to 32 bits correctly. The addition > can produce a carry out from bit 31, which needs to be added in to > the sum to produce the correct result. > > To fix this, we copy the from64to32() function from lib/checksum.c > and use that. This collided with: f9d4286b9516 ("arch/powerpc: Update parameters for csum_tcpudp_magic & csum_tcpudp_nofold") Mind rebasing? cheers
Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/powernv: Initialise nest mmu
Alistair Popplewrites: > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h > index da7c843..6fa9551 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/powernv.h > @@ -9,6 +9,12 @@ static inline void pnv_smp_init(void) { } > > struct pci_dev; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV > +extern void powernv_set_ptcr(unsigned long ptcr); > +#else > +static inline void powernv_set_ptcr(unisigned long ptcr) { } ^ Your shout next time we're at the pub ;) cheers